SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 8253

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
NAVA KUMAR SARMAH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. – Respondent


4. It was urged in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 5581/2022 that the family of the petitioner was in occupation of the subject-plot since long and in view of their such long occupation, the family would be entitled for allotment/ settlement of the subject-plot. It was canvassed that the father of the petitioner preferred an application for such allotment/settlement in the year 2007 and the respondent authorities were taking a long time to process the application for allotment/settlement of the subject-plot. In the course of hearing of the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 5581/2022, it was stated that the Circle Officer, Harisinga Revenue Circle after processing the proposal for allotment/settlement in respect of the subject-plot, had forwarded the proposal along with the necessary report to the Member Secretary of the concerned Land Advisory Board for further consideration. It was, thus, contended that as the respondent authorities had not brought the process of allotment/settlement of the subject-plot to any conclusion, the petitioner had to institute the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 5581/2022 seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to process and pass necessary order on the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top