SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7

ASSAM HIGH COURT
DEKA, J
Sri Khagendra Nath Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application of art. 226 procedures. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding the cancellation of permits. (Para 3)
3. considerations of jurisdiction and natural justice. (Para 4 , 5)
4. importance of judicial proceedings in permit decisions. (Para 6)
5. final ruling on the appeal. (Para 7 , 8)

1. These rules arise out of applications under Art.226 of the Constitution and can be disposed of by one common judgment.

2. Rule No. 138 of 1959 arises out of an application by one Sri Khagendra Nath Das who was granted a permit by the Regional Transport Authority, Gauhati to ply his bus on the Narth - Gauhati - Sarthebari - Barpeta route in the year 1956. From time to time temporary permits were granted to the petitioner along with five others on the said route on the ground that the State Government was contemplating to nationalise the route. This renewal of the temporary permits continued after every four months till 1959 when it was given out by the State Government that they no longer intended to nationalise the route. It was decided that the number of the permits be increased from six to sixteen on this route.
The number was however reduced to twelve. In its meeting held from 30






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top