ASSAM HIGH COURT
DEKA, J
Sri Khagendra Nath Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application of art. 226 procedures. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the cancellation of permits. (Para 3) |
| 3. considerations of jurisdiction and natural justice. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. importance of judicial proceedings in permit decisions. (Para 6) |
| 5. final ruling on the appeal. (Para 7 , 8) |
1. These rules arise out of applications under Art.226 of the Constitution and can be disposed of by one common judgment.
2. Rule No. 138 of 1959 arises out of an application by one Sri Khagendra Nath Das who was granted a permit by the Regional Transport Authority, Gauhati to ply his bus on the Narth - Gauhati - Sarthebari - Barpeta route in the year 1956. From time to time temporary permits were granted to the petitioner along with five others on the said route on the ground that the State Government was contemplating to nationalise the route. This renewal of the temporary permits continued after every four months till 1959 when it was given out by the State Government that they no longer intended to nationalise the route. It was decided that the number of the permits be increased from six to sixteen on this route.
The number was however reduced to twelve. In its meeting held from 30
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.