SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 8

ASSAM HIGH COURT
S. K. Dutta, J
Bhagwan Das Sukul v. Dhananjoy Paul


Table of Content
1. subject matter of possession suit (Para 1 , 2)
2. tenancy claims and construction protections (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. ejectment on grounds of non-proof of claims (Para 6 , 10)
4. statutory protections versus contractual tenancy (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

1. This appeal is by the defendants arising out of a suit for the delivery of possession over the land set out in the schedule attached to the plaint by evicting the defendants therefrom and removing the houses and other constructions made by the defendants thereon. The trial court decreed the suit for possession on deposit of Rs. 2,000/- as compensation to the defendants Nos. 1 to 6 for those constructions and directed the defendants to remove the houses from the land. Three months, time was granted to the defendants to vacate the land, and the parties were directed to bear their own costs of the suit. On appeal by the defendants the Additional Subordinate Judge affirmed the decree of the court below. It is against this decree that the present appeal has been filed.

2. Plaintiff's case as set out in the plaint was that the plaintiff was the owner in possession of the land measuring 9 K. 2 Ch. within the Silchar Municipality. On






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top