SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 1

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
D. PATHAK, J
Shri Kumar Rasik Chandra Deb Barma – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Commissioner, Tripura – Respondent


Table of Content
1. eligibility for supersession under municipal law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. challenging legality of the appointed administrator. (Para 4 , 5)
3. application of res judicata principles. (Para 6 , 8)
4. interpretation of sections regarding supersession period. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. validity of tax demand procedures. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
6. final ruling on petition dismissal. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)

1. This is an application under Art.226 of the Constitution of India by Shri Kumar Rasik Chandra Deb Barma a resident and rate payer of Agartala Municipality praying for an appropriate writ quashing the order of the Chief Commissioner, Tripura, dated 25th day of April, 1955 superseding the Commissioners of the Agartala Municipality under S.292 of the Tripura Municipal Act (since repealed and hereinafter called the Tripura Act) read with para 5 of the Tripura (Administration) O.1949 for a period of one year and the subsequent orders extending the said supersession order under S.293 of the Tripura Act till 1961 and thereafter under S.554 of the Bengal Municipal Act , 1932 (hereinafter called the Bengal Act), which was extended to Tripura, and also the notice of demand, dat
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top