GAUHATI HIGH COURT
D. PATHAK, J
Shri Kumar Rasik Chandra Deb Barma – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Commissioner, Tripura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility for supersession under municipal law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. challenging legality of the appointed administrator. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. application of res judicata principles. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. interpretation of sections regarding supersession period. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. validity of tax demand procedures. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. final ruling on petition dismissal. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
1. This is an application under Art.226 of the Constitution of India by Shri Kumar Rasik Chandra Deb Barma a resident and rate payer of Agartala Municipality praying for an appropriate writ quashing the order of the Chief Commissioner, Tripura, dated 25th day of April, 1955 superseding the Commissioners of the Agartala Municipality under S.292 of the Tripura Municipal Act (since repealed and hereinafter called the Tripura Act) read with para 5 of the Tripura (Administration) O.1949 for a period of one year and the subsequent orders extending the said supersession order under S.293 of the Tripura Act till 1961 and thereafter under S.554 of the Bengal Municipal Act , 1932 (hereinafter called the Bengal Act), which was extended to Tripura, and also the notice of demand, dat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.