Sri Motilal Upadhyaya vs Dimberswar Bora and others

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

1996 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 2

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
B. N. Singh 'Neelam', J.
Sri Motilal Upadhyaya – Appellant
Versus
Dimberswar Bora and others – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K. K. Mahanta
For the Respondents: B. K. Goswami

Table of Content
1. clarifies the appeal's origin and basis. (Para 1)
2. discusses arguments regarding the procedural fairness of revisional hearings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. defines the quasi-judicial nature of the proceedings. (Para 5)
4. reiterates the constraints on invoking inherent jurisdiction in repeat revisions. (Para 6)
5. affirms the dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 7)

1. This Criminal Revision is so preferred by the sole petitioner Sri Motilal Upadhyaya against the Judgement and Order dated 30-9-1994 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Nagaon, in C.M. case No. 87 (N)94 affirming the Order of the Executive Magistrate dated 20-6-1994 passed in M.R. Case No. 32/94 - a proceeding under S.145, Cr. P.C. declaring the possession of Dimberswar Bora and others figuring here opposite party over the land in proceeding.

2. Mr. K. K. Mahanta, learned counsel, for the petitioner and B. K. Goswami, learned counsel for the opposite party are heard at length.

3. 0n behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Mahanta, learned counsel submits that though following Order so passed in proceeding under S.145, Cr. P.C. against the present petitioner by the Executive Magistrate on 20-6-1994, Criminal Revisio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document