SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 3

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
, J
State of Tripura – Appellant
Versus
Shri Sridhan Choudhury – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. P. Dutta

Table of Content
1. civil revisions involve identical questions of law regarding fatal accidents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. jurisdictional challenges concerning the learned district judge's role. (Para 4 , 5)
3. no tribunal is permitted under the act, impacting jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7 , 10)
4. lack of specific plea prejudices claimants. (Para 9)
5. court directs remand for fresh adjudication of cases. (Para 11 , 12)

1. In both the Civil Revisions identical questions of law have been raised by the petitioners, the State of Tripura and another and as such it is prepared to decide and dispose of both the Civil Revisions by a common judgment.

2.This Civil Revision under S.115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed at the instance of the State of Tripura and another against the final judgment / Order dated 4-8-1998, passed by the learned Commissioner, Fatal Accident Claims Tribunal, South Tripura, Udaipur in Case No. Title Suit (Fatal Accident) 165 of 1997.
The respondents herein Shri Sridhan Choudhury and another filed the case bearing No. T.S. (Fatal Accident) 165 of 1997 seeking compensation for the accidental death of Bishakha Choudhury (wife of the respondent No. 1 Shri Shridhan Choudhury)



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top