SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 4

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
P.P. NAOLEKAR, CJ, I.A. ANSARI, J
C. Thangmma v. State of Mizoram


Table of Content
1. prima facie evidence of statutory violation. (Para 2)
2. mandate for government action. (Para 3)
3. conclusion of the case. (Para 4)

1This PIL has been filed making allegations as contained in paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, they are reproduced below -

"5. That the petitioner states that one Pu. Hranghleikapa of Samphai in the State of Mizoram donated a barking deer on 14-6-2000 which he found in the forest at Samphai to Pu. K Vanlaluava, Minister of State, Government of Mizoram for handing over the same to the Government run Mini Zoo at Aizawl. Then the said Minister by his Government Gypsy vehicle No. MZ - 01-2082 carried the deer to Aizawl. While transporting the said wild animal, the said Sri K. Vanlaluava did not obtain any permission from the Chief Wild Life Warden of any Authorized Officer of the State Government as contemplated under S.48(A) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 . Later on, it was found that the servants of the said K Vanlaluava prepared the meat of the animal for the purpose of the dinner hosted by K Vanlaluava in honour of the Hon'ble Chief Minister of the State.

6. That the aforesaid facts were reported in the local newspapers in Mizoram and on t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top