Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
T. N. A. S. R. Nair, J
Sadat Ali and Others v. State of Tripura
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and procedural context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of prosecution cases leading to the appeals. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. defense's need for evidence following prosecution claims. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal standards for fair trial and evidence admissibility. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. remedial actions taken to ensure justice. (Para 22 , 24) |
1. By this common judgment and order, we propose to dispose of the two Criminal Appeals, namely, Crl. Appl. No. 35 of 1998 and Crl. Appl. No. 48 of 1998, which have been heard together on account of the fact that they arise out of a common judgment and order, dated 21-5-1998, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, North Tripura, Kailashahar, in Case No. Sessions Trial 15 (NT / K) of 1993.
2. By the impugned judgment and order, dated 21-5-1998, aforementioned, the accused - appellants stand convicted under S.302 read with S.149 of the Indian Penal Code and also under S.323 read with S.149 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer, for their conviction udner S.302 read with S.149 of the Indian Penal Code, life imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each and, in default, to suffer R.I. for six months and to suffer, for t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
