SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 2

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
T. N. A. S. R. Nair, J
Sadat Ali and Others v. State of Tripura


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. S. Kar Bhowmik, Mr. D. C. Roy
For the Respondents: Mr. D. Sarkar

1. By this common judgment and order, we propose to dispose of the two Criminal Appeals, namely, Crl. Appl. No. 35 of 1998 and Crl. Appl. No. 48 of 1998, which have been heard together on account of the fact that they arise out of a common judgment and order, dated 21-5-1998, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, North Tripura, Kailashahar, in Case No. Sessions Trial 15 (NT / K) of 1993.

2. By the impugned judgment and order, dated 21-5-1998, aforementioned, the accused - appellants stand convicted under S.302 read with S.149 of the Indian Penal Code and also under S.323 read with S.149 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer, for their conviction udner S.302 read with S.149 of the Indian Penal Code, life imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each and, in default, to suffer R.I. for six months and to suffer, for their conviction under S.323 read with S.149 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for six months, both the sentences having been directed to run concurrently.

3. The case of the prosecution, as unfolded at the trial, may, in brief, be stated as follows : -
On 24-6-1990 at about 10 P.M. Masuk Ali, while purchasing bidi from the shop of one Maya Miah, at Irani Market, h
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top