SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 5

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
, J
Md. Hiran Mia v. The State of Tripura


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. B. Das
For the Respondents: Mr. A. Ghosh

Table of Content
1. judicial process involved in the appeal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. description of the incident and procedural history. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. arguments presented by both parties regarding negligence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. legal reasoning about dual convictions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. final determination of the court regarding the sentence. (Para 15 , 16)

1. The petitioner has filed this revision petition under S.397 read with S.401, CrPC for quashing / setting aside the judgment and order dated 15-5-2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, West Tripura District, Khowai in Cri. Appl. No. 1 (1) 03 affirming the judgment dated 3-1-2003 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khowai in G.R. Case No. 150 of 2001 whereby and whereunder the petitioner was convicted under S.279, IPC to suffer S. I. for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment to suffer S. I. for one month and further convicted under S.337, IPC to suffer S. I. for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment to suffer S. I. for 15 days. Both the sentences would run consecutively.

2. Heard Mr. B. Das, learned senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top