SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 6

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Unnamed, J
Raba Laxmi Debbarma and Others v. Nupur Deb and Another
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Khowai, West Tripura T.S. (M.A.C.) No. 23 of 2006



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Talapatra, Mr. Bhattacharjee
For the Respondents: Mr. P. Gautam

Negligence and compensation must be established through proper pleadings; evidence without pleadings is inadmissible.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 - Enhancement of award - The appeal was filed for increasing the compensation amount awarded by the Tribunal for the death of the deceased due to vehicular accident - The deceased was 42 years old, working as Deputy Inspector of Schools with a net monthly emolument of Rs. 7,678. The Tribunal's finding of contributory negligence was rejected as perverted, since it was not pleaded or evidenced - Future prospects of income addition was applied, resulting in a total compensation amount of Rs. 13,57,489. (Paras 11-16)

(B) Pleadings - The court emphasized the importance of pleadings and held that evidence cannot be accepted without proper pleadings. The ruling in multiple Supreme Court judgments underscores that a party cannot adduce evidence on unpleaded issues (Paras 8-10).

Table of Content
1. petition for compensation was filed against the insurance company after the accident. (Para 1 , 2)
2. summary of the incident leading to the claim was presented. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. witness testimonies confirmed the negligence of the offending vehicle. (Para 6 , 7)
4. pleadings are vital for the admissibility of evidence in court. (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 13)
5. standards for compensation calculation were discussed and applied. (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

1. This appeal, for enhancement of the award, under S.173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , is directed against the judgment and award dated 17.3.2007 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Khowai, West Tripura in T.S. (M.A.C.) No. 23 of 2006.

2. Heard Mr. Talapatra, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, as well as Mr. P. Gautam, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. The service of notice to the respondent No. 1 by registered post with A.D. shall be deemed to have been effected properly under O.5, R.9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, inasmuch as neither the A.D. card nor the registered post returned unserved even after lapse of many months from the date of taking steps for service of notice to the respondent No. 1 by registered post with A.D. None appears for the respondent No. 1 without showing any cause.

3. The concise facts sans unnecessary details leading to the filing of T.S. (M.A.C.) No. 23 of 2006 are noted for decision of the present appeal -
The appellants - claimants are the wife, children and mother of the deceased Dilip Debbarma, who was serving as Deputy Inspector of Schools in the Government of Tripura and he (late Dilip Debbarma) was aged about 42 years at the time of his death in a vehicular accident on 4.10.2006. On that very day, i.e., on 4.10.2006, while Dilip Debbarma was coming from the side of Teliamura to his house at Mograi Sadhu Para, Jairania, on a motor cycle and reached near the Lake Point on 44, National Highway at Baramura, the offending vehicle, i.e., Tata truck bearing registration No. AS 01 - K 8076 dashed him from the back side at a high speed due to the negligent driving of the offending vehicle. As a result of the said vehicular accident, the deceased Dilip Debbarma sustained head injury and other injuries and died on the spot. Then and there, one Sishir Debnath, a T.S.R. Jawan (Havildar), who was on duty at Lake Point, Baramura, lodged an ejahar for the said vehicular accident at the Teliamura Police Station and, accordingly, Teliamura P.S. Case No. 62/2006 dated 4.10.2006 was registered under S.279/304 - A of Indian Penal Code. Thereafter, deceased Dilip Debbarma was taken to Teliamura Hospital, where he was declared as brought dead. After performing the post - mortem examination of the dead body of Dilip Debbarma, his dead body was handed over to appellants - claimants.

4. After investigation, police submitted the charge - sheet against the driver of the offending vehicle in the court of the S.D.J.M., Khowai, West Tripura. Present respondent No. 2, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., is the insurer of offending vehicle bearing registration No. AS 01 - K 8076 vide policy No. 530706/31/06/01/0000209. As per the school certificate, the date of birth of the deceased Dilip Debbarma was 14.11.1964 and as such, at the time of his death, deceased Dilip Debbarma was aged 42 years. The total salary, i.e., monthly emolument of the deceased Dilip Debbarma who was working as Deputy Inspector of Schools in the Government of Tripura for September 2006 was Rs. 12,487 and total deduction from the said total emoluments was Rs. 4,809. As such, after deduction of the said amount, i.e., Rs. 4,809, the net monthly emolument of the deceased Dilip Debbarma was Rs. 7,678, which was also certified by the Head of Office and D.D.O., Education Inspectorate, Harepkuwer, Khowai, Tripura, T.T.A.A.D.C.

5. The appellants - claimants filed T.
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top