Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
T. Vaiphei, J
Chandan Muhuri – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeal context and parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of the incident. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. defense arguments against conviction. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. prosecution's perspective on credibility. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. court's analysis and assessment of evidence. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. conclusion on the reliability of prosecution witnesses. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. final decision on the appeal. (Para 43) |
1. This appeal is preferred by two accused persons, namely, Chandan Muhuri and Rakhal Biswas, against the judgment and order dated 28-6-2003 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Belonia, South Tripura in S.T. case No. 21 (ST / B) / 2002 convicting the appellant Chandan under S.376(1) and S.457 IPC and sentencing him to suffer R. I. for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default to suffer further R. I. for one year under S.376(1) IPC and to suffer R. I. for one year under S.457 IPC, and also convicting the appellant Rakhal under S.109 read with S.376(1) and S.342 IPC and sentencing him to suffer R. I. for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/-, in default to suff
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
