SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 18

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
A. B. Pal, J
Dipak Nama – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. S. Chakraborty
For the Respondent: Mr. D. Sarkar

1. The instant criminal appeal is filed by the appellant, challenging the judgment dated 29-6-2005 passed by learned Addl. Session Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar in Case No. ST 57 (NT / D) of 2004 and the order of sentence dated 30-6-2005 in the aforesaid Sessions Trial case wherein after considering the evidence on record the appellant was convicted under S.302, IPC and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, i.e. to make payment of fine to suffer further RI for six months.

2. Heard Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. D. Sarkar, learned Public Prosecutor for the State - respondent.

3. When the appeal was pending a plea of juvenility was taken up by the appellant in a criminal miscellaneous case being No. Crl. Misc. Case No. 95/2012, wherein he also prayed for adducing additional evidence to prove his plea of juvenility. This Court vide order dated 5-6-2012 in the aforesaid Crl. M. Application directed the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar to submit his report after conducting a proper inquiry on the plea of juvenility of the convict appellant. In the said order it was also mentioned that a






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top