Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
K. B. Roy, J
Buddhadeb Debnath – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction upheld based on proven offences despite initial major charge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defence arguments on charge framing and intent evaluation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. evidence assessment supporting the prosecution's claims. (Para 8 , 18) |
| 4. court outlines legal principles for convicting minor offences under crpc. (Para 22) |
| 5. final ruling confirmed for concurrent sentencing. (Para 23) |
1. This appeal by the convict, hereafter referred to as the appellant, questions the legality of the judgment of conviction dated 10.08.2011 delivered in case No. S.T. 69 of 2010 by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.3, West Tripura, Agartala convicting the appellant for committing offence punishable under S.448 and S.354 of the IPC. As consequence of the said conviction, the appellant has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year for committing offence punishable under S.448 of the IPC. and rigorous imprisonment for two years for committing offence punishable under S.354 of the IPC. with a direction that the sentence shall run consecutively.
2. On 15-04-2010 the prosecutrix, the name withheld for protecting her identity by filing a written Ejahar disclosed that
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
