Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
V. C. J., J
Sachindra Das – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revisional application against conviction. (Para 1) |
| 2. facts of the case involving withdrawal and alleged theft of funds. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments on inadequacy of evidence for conviction. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal definitions surrounding criminal breach of trust. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's analysis on evidence and legal interpretations. (Para 24 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. court conclusion on benefit of doubt leading to acquittal. (Para 32 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
1. This revisional application, under S.397 read with S.401 of Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment and order dated 09.12.2011, passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Dharmanagar, North Tripura, in Criminal Appeal No. 40(4) / 2011 whereunder the learned Addl. Sessions Judge upheld the judgment and order of conviction and sentence, dated 31.10.2011, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Kanchanpur, North Tripura in Case No. GR 130/2010 against accused - petitioner Sachindra Das, who was charged in the criminal trial for commission of offence punishable under S.409 of IPC and learned Magistrate found him guilty of the charge and sentenced him to suffer R.I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
