Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Arindam Lodh, J
Nani Kanta Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on established facts. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the credibility of witnesses. (Para 4 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's analysis of witness testimonies. (Para 7 , 12 , 19) |
| 4. common intention inferred from actions. (Para 18 , 24 , 26) |
| 5. legal standards for assessing intent. (Para 25) |
| 6. standards for contradictions in court. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 7. final dismissal of appeals. (Para 35 , 36) |
1. Both the appeals are directed against a single judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 19.12.2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, North Tripura District, Kailashahar in Sessions Trial Case No.8(NT / K)2013, whereunder both the appellants were found guilty of the charges framed against them under S.448 read with S.34 of IPC and S.302 read with S.34 of IPC and the learned Sessions Judge by the impugned judgment and order sentenced them to suffer R.I. for six months for commission of offence punishable under S.448 read with S.34 of IPC and for commission of offence punishable under S.302 read with S.34 of IPC to suffer R.I. for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default of payment to suffer further R.I. for six months.
2. Heard learned senior counsel, Mr.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
