SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 129

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
, J
Joydeb Das v. State of Tripura and Another


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A. K. Bhowmik
For the Respondents: R.C. Debnath

1. In this criminal revision, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 28-1-2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Agartala, in S.T. No. 141 of 2012, framing the charges against the petitioner u/S. 302/201/34, IPC, by rejecting his prayer for discharge.

2. The facts giving rise to this criminal revision are that Bishalgrah P.S. Case No. 151/2012, u/S. 304 - A / 201 of IPC and S.135(1)(a) of the Electricity Act , 2003, was registered against, among others, the petitioner on the basis of the FIR dated 29-10-2011 lodged by the respondent No. 2. The allegation of the respondent No. 2 is that on 28-10-2011, she along with her husband (the deceased) had gone to orchestra event in their own locality, but she returned home leaving her husband behind and that on the following morning at 6.30 a.m., she found her husband lying dead with electric burn injuries on his leg, at the backyard of the house of the co - accused Suman Bhowmik. After investigation of the case, the police submitted the charge - sheet against the petitioner, co - accused Suman Bhowmik and his wife, Rakhi Bhowmik u/S. 302/201/34, IPC. On commitment, the learned Sessions Judge, West Tripura











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top