Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
X, J
Manindra Kishore Paul v. Badal Ch. Das
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of money suit (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of loan and cheque dishonour (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. contentions of the defendant (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. evidence presented by both parties (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. findings of the trial court (Para 12 , 14) |
| 6. expert evidence and its challenges (Para 15 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. issues relating to signature authenticity (Para 20 , 21) |
| 8. evaluation of plaintiff's evidence (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. burden of proof standards in civil vs. criminal cases (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. weight of expert opinion (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. context of expert testimony (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 12. assessment criteria for expert witnesses (Para 37 , 38) |
| 13. acceptance of expert opinions in court (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 14. reliability of evidence and conclusions (Para 42 , 43) |
| 15. final ruling on loan and dishonoured cheque (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
1. This appeal under S.96 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the judgment and decree dated 15.09.2012 passed by learned Civil Judge, Sr. Div. Kailashahar, North Tripura (now Unakoti) in Money Suit No. 01/2011.
2. Heard learned senior counsel, Mr. S. Deb assisted by learned counsel, Mr. P. Roy Barman for the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
