The allocation of reserved seats must follow institutional policies ensuring compliance with relevant laws, without arbitrary conversion of categories.

1. Heard Mr. Arijit Bhowmik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. B. C. Das, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. D. C. Nath, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents - State. Also heard Mr. A. Nandi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4, Mr. C. S. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5 and Mr. Somik Deb, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 6.

2. Both these writ petitions being W.P.(C) No. 1062 of 2017 [Sri Arghyadeep Das v. The State of Tripura and others] and W.P.(C) No. 1063 of 2017 [Smt. Priyanka Das v. The State of Tripura and others] are consolidated for disposal by a common judgment as the challenge in these petitions are structured on the common grounds and relating to admission in the MBBS course, 2017 in Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (in short the RIMS) by the second counselling held by the Common Counselling Committee, NEET - UG 2017 under the Directorate of Medical Education, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Tripura.

3. The petitioners namely Sri Arghyadeep Das and Smt. Priyanka Das do belong to Scheduled Castes (in short SC) community and they are respectively holding the All India ranking 110002 and 223247 and they appeared in the counselling for admission against the State (Domicile) seats viz. seats from Agartala Government Medical College (in short the AGMC), the RIMS, Imphal, Manipur and Tripura Medical College (in short the TMC), Agartala. The respective merit position for the State (Domicile) seats of the writ petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 1062 of 2017 [Sri Arghyadeep Das] and the writ petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 1063 of 2017 [Smt. Priyanka Das] are '108' and '267'. The seat matrix dated 16.07.2017 for the first round of counselling revealed that 13 MBBS seats were available from the RIMS under the State (Domicile) quota. Out of those seats 7 belonged to UR category, 4 belonged to ST category and 2 belonged to SC category.

4. On completion of the allotment made in the first counselling, it further revealed that 3 seats were available from the RIMS. In order to allot those seats, the seat matrix for the second round of common counselling for the NEET - UG 2017, was declared on 17.08.2017. For the second round of common counselling, the State quota seats for MBBS was as under:

5. The petitioners were only interested in the MBBS seats from the State (Domicile) quota. The said seat matrix declared on 17-8-2017 was subsequently corrected by the Chairman - cum - Counselling committee, NEET - UG 2017 by a corrigendum under No. G.5(6) - DME / UG / Counselling / 2017-18 / (Sub-I), dated 18-8-2017. The seat matrix as emerged in terms of the said corrigendum dated 18-8-2017 is as under:

6. It is evident that there was no seat for the SC category candidates in the RIMS. Being aggrieved by the said action of the State - respondents, the petitioners by filing these writ petitions have urged this court for the reliefs as under:

(i) to set aside the seat matrix as declared by the corrigendum dated 18.08.2017 and also (ii) to cancel the allotment of the seats to the respondent Nos. 5 and 6.

7. It is to be noted here that allotment of the seat of the respondent No. 4 against one seat available in the RIMS was challenged even though initially, but later on the said challenge was abandoned inasmuch as availability of seat for U