SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 287

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Mr. K.N. Bhattacharjee, ACJ
Usha Rani Nath (Dey) v. World at Large


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. K.N. Bhattacharjee

Table of Content
1. permission required for guardian to sell minor's property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. grounds for challenging the district judge's decision. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's observation on property sale necessity. (Para 7 , 9)
4. final verdict allowing the appeal. (Para 10)

1. By means of this appeal filed under S.47 - A of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 the appellant has challenged the judgment dated 08.07.2016 delivered in Civil Misc. (G/C) No. 2 of 2015 by the District Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar. By the said judgment, the petitioner - appellant has been refused permission to sell the minor's properties as the appointed guardian.

2. From the judgment dated 08.07.2016 it is apparent that the petitioner - appellant has been appointed as the guardian of the minor namely Sayantika Dey but she has been denied to represent the minor in selling her share in the landed property appertaining to khatian No.615 of Mouja and Tahasil Dharmanagar, Sub-Division - Dharmanagar in R.S. Plot No.8390 classified as vastu (tilla) measuring 0.037 acres as mentioned in Schedule - A of the said petition and khatian No.1895 of Mouja and Tahasil Baruakandi, Sub-Divison Dharmanagar in R.S.Plot










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top