Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
X, J
Biswajit Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused and fir registration. (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. details of the crime and investigation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. circumstantial evidence and lack of eyewitnesses. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. prosecution burden and evidentiary standards. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19) |
| 5. legal tests for circumstantial evidence. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. appellate court's duty to re-examine evidence. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 7. witness testimonies and unlinked evidence. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 8. recovery of bangles and contradictions. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. confessions and their admissibility. (Para 46 , 48) |
| 10. challenges to trial court findings and acquittal. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 66) |
1. Accused Biswajit Das and Rabiul Hossain, both residents of district Sepahijala, Tripura stand convicted for having committed an offence punishable under S.302/394/449 read with S.34 and independently under S.120 - B of the IPC. Another accused namely, Rakibul Hossain did not face trial and as such was declared as a proclaimed offender, in relation to whom, at this point of time, no other and several action stands taken by the police and we are also not called upon to take view thereupon.
2. Undisputedly, with the registratio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
