Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
Arindam Lodh, J
Kanika Debnath – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's application initiated due to eligibility dispute. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding eligibility and fraud. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations regarding residence qualifications. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final decision based on found irregularities. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
1. Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. B.N. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the respondents - Indian Oil Corporation.
2. The facts in brief: -
In response to an advertisement notified in the daily newspapers of Tripura wherein applications were invited from the eligible candidates for appointment of LPG distributors at Village - Kathalia, within Gram Panchayat Block - Kathalia, District - Sepahijala, the petitioner applied for appointment of LPG distributorship. The said notification contains the eligibility criteria as reproduced here - in - below: -
“ a. Applicants should be an Indian Citizens and be a resident of India.
b. Applicant should have passed minimum 10th Standard examination or equivalent from a recognized Board. However, the criterion of educational qualification is not applicable for applicants belonging
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
