SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 309

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
Unknown, J
Sanjit Das v. State of Tripura


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. D. Sarkar
For the Respondents: Mr. A. Roy Barman

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and conviction details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. witness testimonies regarding cruelty and dowry demands. (Para 5 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. appellant's defense and evidence contradictions. (Para 6 , 29)
4. judicial analysis leading to appeal conclusion. (Para 30)

1. Heard Mr. D. Sarkar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. A. Roy Barman, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State.

2. This is an appeal by the convict from the judgment and order dated 22.08.2015 delivered in Case No.S.T. 38(GT / U) / 2014 by the Sessions Judge, Gomati, Udaipur.

3. By the said judgment the appellant has been convicted under S.498A of the IPC , but he has been acquitted from the charge under S.304B of the and S.4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

4. Pursuant to the said judgment dated 22.08.2015 the appellant has been sentenced to suffer 3 (three) years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/- with default stipulation.

5. The prosecution commenced against the appellant when one Dinabandhu Das (PW - 1) lodged a written complaint to the Officer In - Charge, Kakraban Police Station, Udaipur disclosing that his daughter namely, Purnima Das, after her m
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top