SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 401

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
A. S. Ranjan, J
Sentu Rudrapal – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A. Basak
For the Respondents: R. Datta

1. This criminal revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 30.01.2017 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Unakoti Judicial District, Kamalpur in case number Criminal Appeal 14 of 2016 whereby he affirmed the judgment and order dated 28.05.2016 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kamalpur in case number PRC 01 of 2015 convicting the petitioner for having committed offence punishable under S.279 and S.304 - A, IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for 2 (two) years and fine of Rs.2,000/- with default stipulation under S.304 - A, . No separate sentence was awarded for his conviction under S.279, .

2. The prosecution story, briefly stated is that on 02.01.2015, the first informant (PW - 1) lodged the written FIR with the Officer in Charge of Ambassa police station alleging, inter alia, that at about 1 O'clock in the afternoon when his brother Ranjit Das along with Raju Dhar was on their way home from Ambassa on their three wheeler goods' carrier, the speeding vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration No. TR 04 2146 hit their three wheeler carrier from the opposite direction and as a result, said Ranjit Das and Raju Dhar were serious









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top