Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
A. S. Ranjan, J
Sentu Rudrapal – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case overview and initial findings from the trial court. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court’s assessment of evidence and impact on conviction. (Para 8 , 9 , 26) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against conviction. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. discussion on legal standards for establishing negligent driving. (Para 14 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. final outcome and decision on the appeal. (Para 27) |
1. This criminal revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 30.01.2017 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Unakoti Judicial District, Kamalpur in case number Criminal Appeal 14 of 2016 whereby he affirmed the judgment and order dated 28.05.2016 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kamalpur in case number PRC 01 of 2015 convicting the petitioner for having committed offence punishable under S.279 and S.304 - A, IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for 2 (two) years and fine of Rs.2,000/- with default stipulation under S.304 - A, . No separate sentence was awarded for his conviction under S.279, .
2. The prosecution story, briefly stated is that on 02.01.2015, the first informant (PW - 1) lodged the written FIR with the Officer in Charge of Ambassa police station alleging,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
