Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
S. R. SINA, J
Tapan Das v. State of Tripura
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment challenges previous convictions invoking procedural aspects under cr.p.c. and ipc sections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. arguments highlight lack of evidence and the misinterpretation of law leading to wrongful conviction. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. court findings dismiss the allegations of assault indicating non-fulfillment of s.353 ipc criteria. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final verdict quashes previous judgment based on insufficient proof and procedural discrepancies. (Para 14) |
1. By means of this criminal revision petition, filed under S.397 read with S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C. hereinafter), the convict petitioner has challenged the judgment and order dated 01.04.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gomati Judicial District, Udaipur in Crl. Appeal No. 56(4) of 2015 whereby the learned Sessions Judge affirmed his conviction under S.353 IPC while reducing his sentence to RI for six months from RI for one year and setting aside his conviction and sentence under S.384 and S.506 IPC passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udaipur by judgment and order dated 30.09.2015 in case No. PRC 49 of 2013.
2. The brief facts which led to th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
