Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Not stated, J
Sri Kankaj Das – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of facts around the incident leading to the revision petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments by both sides concerning trial court's findings and evidence reliability. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. assessment of the evidence against the standards of negligence and culpability. (Para 22 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. final resolution of the petition, affirming the lower courts' decisions. (Para 30) |
1. This criminal revision petition, filed under S.397 read with S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (Cr. P.C herein), has been directed against the judgment and order dated 13.12.2016 passed by the learned Sessions Judge of North Tripura judicial district, Crl. Rev. P No.1/2017. Dharmanagar in Criminal Appeal No.0000009 of 2016 whereby the learned Sessions Judge affirmed the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 02.05.2016 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, North Tripura in case No. PRC 266 of 2013 convicting the accused petitioner under S.279 and S.304A IPC and sentencing him to suffer S.I for 6(six) months and fine of Rs.1000/- with default stipulation for offence punishable under S.279 and SI for 1(one) year and fine of Rs.2000/- with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
