Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
, J
Smti Supriya Bhattacharjee – Appellant
Versus
Sri Debabrata Chakraborty – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. maintenance petitions must reflect the financial reality of both parties post-divorce. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. determination of maintenance involves consideration of the husband's income and the needs of the wife and child. (Para 2 , 8) |
| 3. wife's standard of living and husband’s financial obligations are critical in maintenance disputes. (Para 5 , 9) |
1. By means of this criminal revision petition, the petitioner (the wife hereinafter) has challenged the order dated 30.05.2019 of the Additional Judge, Family Court, Agartala passed in case No. Misc. 344 of 2018 whereby the monthly maintenance allowance payable to her has been enhanced from Rs.5000/- to Rs.8000/- declining her request for enhancing the amount from Rs.5000/- to Rs.23,500/- per month.
2. The brief facts which have led to the filing of this revision petition are as under:
Marriage between the parties was solemnised in accordance with the rites and customs of Hindu marriage on 02/02/2003. After marriage, a daughter was born to them within their wedlock. Few years thereafter, matrimonial dispute developed between them for various reasons and the wife left the company of her husband along with her daughter and started
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
