SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 416

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
, J
Smti Supriya Bhattacharjee – Appellant
Versus
Sri Debabrata Chakraborty – Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition No. 44 of 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. A. Debbarma
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Paul

The court emphasized the husband’s duty to maintain an adequate standard of living for his ex-wife and child, reflective of his income and their necessities.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 125 - Enhancement of maintenance - The petitioner sought enhancement from Rs.5,000/- to Rs.23,500/- but was granted Rs.8,000/- by Family Court - Income of the husband, rising needs of the petitioner and daughter, and standard of living considered - Court held that the petitioner and daughter are entitled to maintain a similar standard of living as they had during marriage. (Paras 8, 10)

(B) Maintenance - Factors determining constitution - Court emphasized financial ability of husband, needs of the wife and child, and residential circumstances for determining adequate maintenance. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The marriage between the parties was solemnized in 2003, daughter was born, deterioration of relations led to legal proceedings for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and ultimately a decree of divorce with maintenance settled at Rs.5,000/-.

Findings of Court:
Monthly maintenance allowance was enhanced to Rs.17,000/-, considering husband’s income and need for dignity of life.

Issues: The issues revolved around the adequacy of maintenance allowance and the husband’s ability to support post-divorce.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated the obligation of a husband towards his ex-wife and child to maintain a reasonable standard of living as determined by income and reasonable expenses.

Result: The maintenance allowance is set at Rs.17,000/- per month, effective from the date of the Family Court ruling.

Table of Content
1. maintenance petitions must reflect the financial reality of both parties post-divorce. (Para 1 , 3)
2. determination of maintenance involves consideration of the husband's income and the needs of the wife and child. (Para 2 , 8)
3. wife's standard of living and husband’s financial obligations are critical in maintenance disputes. (Para 5 , 9)

1. By means of this criminal revision petition, the petitioner (the wife hereinafter) has challenged the order dated 30.05.2019 of the Additional Judge, Family Court, Agartala passed in case No. Misc. 344 of 2018 whereby the monthly maintenance allowance payable to her has been enhanced from Rs.5000/- to Rs.8000/- declining her request for enhancing the amount from Rs.5000/- to Rs.23,500/- per month.

2. The brief facts which have led to the filing of this revision petition are as under:
Marriage between the parties was solemnised in accordance with the rites and customs of Hindu marriage on 02/02/2003. After marriage, a daughter was born to them within their wedlock. Few years thereafter, matrimonial dispute developed between them for various reasons and the wife left the company of her husband along with her daughter and started living with her parents. Since the wife had no income and she was thus unable to maintain herself and her daughter, she claimed maintenance allowance under S.125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C hereinafter) in the Family Court at Agartala. The Judge, Family Court by his order dated 01.11.2006 allowed her petition and taking into consideration the income of her husband and her needs allowed monthly maintenance allowance of Rs.2200/- to her and Rs.800/- to her daughter. Eager to take back his wife and resume conjugal life, the husband then filed a petition in the Family Court at Agartala for restitution of conjugal rights. The wife contested the suit brought by her husband and ultimately the Family Court, Agartala vide order dated 06.05.2008 decreed the suit and asked the wife to come back to her husband for resumption of conjugal life. There was no response from the side of the wife. Therefore, the husband approached the Family court seeking a decree of divorce on the ground that there was no resumption of cohabitation between them for a period of more than one year after the decree for restitution of conjugal rights was passed by the Court. The wife contested the divorce suit and brought various allegations against her husband including physical torture and extra marital affairs etc. The Family Court, Agartala after hearing the parties and recording their evidence passed a decree of divorce dissolving their marriage under S.13(1A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act , 1955 and while decreeing the suit for divorce the Family court allowed monthly maintenance allowance of Rs.5,000/- to the petitioner and it was ordered that maintenance allowance of Rs.3,000/- already granted to her in the past proceeding under S.125 Cr. P.C shall be adjusted towards the maintenance allowance of Rs.5,000/- and finally the wife would get Rs.5,000/- per month. The said decree of divorce was passed on 16.09.2010. Circumstances rapidly changed thereafter. The salary of the husband rose after he became Headmaster of a Higher Secondary school.
As a result of escalation in the price of essential goods and increase in the educational expenses of her daughter and for other reasons the wife required more amount of maintenance allowance to support herself and her daughter as she had no other source of income. Therefore, she filed a petition in the Family Court in the year 2018 for raising her monthly maintenance allowance from Rs.5,000/- to Rs.23,500/- per month. The husband contested the case. The Family Court after hearing the parties allowed the petition of the wife raising her maintenance allowance from Rs.5,000/- to Rs.8,000/- vide order dated 30.05.2019. Aggrieved with this order, the wife has approached this Court by means of this criminal revision petition seeking enh














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top