SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 433

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
A. P. Saha, J
Soumen Sarkar v. State of Tripura represented by the Secretary Home Department
Writ Petition under Art.226 of the Constitution of India



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A. Roy Barman
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Kar Bhowmik

Issuance of a Lookout Circular requires substantial justification; mere allegations and lack of a warrant renders it unlawful.

Headnote:(A) Art. 226 of the Constitution of India - Passport Act, 1967 - Lookout Circular issued against petitioner, a non-resident Indian news portal editor - Jurisdiction of police to seek issuance and enforcement of LOC challenged - Police action deemed unlawful as no warrant or substantive grounds for LOC exist (Paras 1, 33-39).

(B) Procedural Requirements for LOC - Investigating agency must provide proper justification for issuing LOC - Mere allegations are not sufficient grounds (Paras 10-12, 30-35).

(C) Human Rights Considerations - Action affecting personal liberty must adhere to the principles of proportionality and legality (Paras 38-39).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contended that the LOC issued against him was unjustified and an attempt to silence his investigative reporting revealing wrongdoings by powerful individuals, citing harassment faced by himself and his parents.

Findings of Court:
LOC issued without valid justification. Police action was found unlawful; therefore, the LOC must be quashed.

Issues: The main issues involved the authority of the police to issue LOCs without a court warrant and whether the circumstances justified such an aggressive action against a non-resident citizen.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that LOC cannot be issued merely for investigation purposes without showing evidence of evasion or any standing warrant, and that the petitioner retains the right to travel freely absent any such reasonable restrictions.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenged the loc on grounds of personal safety and freedom of press. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. legal arguments surrounding the validity of the loc issuance as per the passport act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. procedural requirements for issuing an loc and ensuring lawful police practices. (Para 10 , 12 , 30 , 33)
4. potential infringement on personal liberties and the need for lawful justification. (Para 19 , 20 , 38 , 39)

1. By means of this petition, filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the lookout circular dated 28.01.2020 by Bureau of Immigration and communication dated 30.09.2018 written by the Superintendent of Police, West Tripura to the Regional Passport Officer at Kolkata. He has further challenged the letters dated 14.10.2019 and 13.11.2019 written by the Superintendent of Police, West Tripura to the Bureau of Immigration.

2. The writ petitioner is a non - resident Indian and he has been hosting a news portal named and styled as Tripura Infoway.com which is registered in U.S.A. The petitioner also holds the position of editor of the said news portal. The said news portal has become the target, according to the petitioner, for fearlessly exposing the cause of common people. The parents of the petitioner residing permanently in Tripura. His father is an octogenarian whereas his mother is a septuagenarian. They have become subjected to harassment by the police. He and his parents had been threatened and intimidated by the police personnel. Smti. Neuti Sarkar, the mother of the petitioner had approached this High Court by filing a writ petition being W.P. (C) No. 52/2019 wherein the Superintendent of Police, West Tripura had been directed to assuage the petitioner's parents and visit their residence after giving notice for appointment in their convenient time considering their age, if the police were in need of any information from them [see the order dated 17.01.2019 delivered in W.P. (C) No. 52/2019]. Against the petitioner, cognizance under S.500 of the IPC was taken by the Sessions Judge, West Tripura, Agartala for alleged streaming of false content in his news portal. The said case had been registered as CR 04/2017.

3. Sri. Gautam Das, a leader of the ruling party at the relevant point of time filed a complaint against the petitioner for streaming a news item on 22.10.2017 in his portal. Cognizance was taken under S.500 of the IPC by the order dated 07.12.2017 in C.R.373/2017 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Tripura. Another complaint being CR01 of 2018 was launched by Sri. Saheed Choudhury, the then Minister, Department of Youth Affairs and Sports, Government of Tripura alleging defamation and cognizance was taken by the Sessions Judge on 05.04.2018 under S.500 of the IPC. Again, another complaint was lodged by Sri. Biplab Kumar Deb, Chief Minister of Tripura through the Public Prosecutor, District - West Tripura taking aid of S.199(2) of the CrPC. By the order dated 04.05.2019 cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under S.500 of the IPC. One 'false' compliant had been to the police station on 21.09.2018 to the Officer - in - Charge East Agartala Police Station by a person alleging that at about 11 hrs., the petitioner called him and demanded a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with warning that if the said demand was not met, the 'information' regarding his involvement in drug smuggling would be broadcast. On the basis of the said written complaint, an investigation was initiated under S.157 of the CrPC on entering the substance of the compliant in East Agartala P.S. G.D. Entry No. 37 dated 21.09.2018. Another compliant of that nature was also filed in East Agartala P.S. and on the basis of the said complaint, East P.S. case No. 207 under S.384/511 of the IPC was registered. The petitioner has filed one criminal petition being Criminal petition No. 51 of 2019 in this High Court for quashing East Agartala P.S. Case No. 208 Eag / 2004 under S.384/511 of






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top