TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Arindam Lodh, J
Nirmal Paul – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Namita Paul – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts relevant to marriage and allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding potential irretrievable breakdown. (Para 4 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. observations on conduct and the essence of desertion. (Para 6 , 10 , 18 , 20 , 22 , 30) |
| 4. final decision based on the family's circumstances. (Para 9 , 31) |
| 5. court's reasoning regarding desertion. (Para 11 , 19 , 21 , 25) |
1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant husband being aggrieved and dissatisfied with judgment dated 30.04.2015 passed by the Family Court, Agartala in case No. TS (Divorce) 332 of 2009 rejecting his petition for divorce.
2. The facts in a nutshell are that appellant Nirmal Paul and respondent Smt. Namita Paul entered into matrimonial alliance as per Hindu rites and rituals at Agartala on 30th Baisakha, 1408 B. S. corresponding to 14 May, 2001. It is the case of the appellant that a month after marriage, his wife started misbehaving with him. At that time the appellant lived in a common mess with his old parents, three brothers and their families which was not liked by his respondent wife. She demanded a separate mess and told her appellant husband that it was not possible on her part to prepare food fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.