Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
string, J
Tulsi Malakar and Another v. State of Tripura and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner removal process context. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners challenge authority's power. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. statutory provisions on panchayat removals. (Para 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. failure to follow mandatory notice requirements. (Para 11) |
| 5. order set aside, petitioners restored. (Para 12) |
1. Petitioners have challenged an order dated 17 December 2019 as Annexure - 4 which, if one goes simply by the operative portion, amounts to removal of the petitioner No. 2 as an Upa - Pradhan of Santir Bazar Gram Panchayat. However, if one reads the entire order, the purport of the order is to remove the petitioners No.1 and 2 from the position of Pradhan and Upa - Pradhan respectively of the said Gram Panchayat. We do not find any separate order specifically removing the petitioner No. 1 as a Pradhan of the Gram Panchayat. However, it is an admitted position that respondent Nos.7 and 8 have been inducted as Pradhan and Upa - Pradhan of the said Gram Panchayat on the seats vacated by the petitioners. We, therefore, proceed on the basis that the impugned order at Annexure - 4 dated 17 December, 2019 is one by which the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 were removed as Pradhan and Upa - Pradhan of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
