Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Sajan Suklabaidya v. State of Tripura
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeal and lower court's decision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts surrounding the incident and police investigation. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. arguments regarding witness credibility. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's consideration of evidence and affirmation of conviction. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling and dismissal of appeal. (Para 12 , 13) |
1. Heard Ms. M. Roy, learned Counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. S. Ghosh, learned Additional PP appearing for the State - respondent.
2. This is an appeal under S.374, Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 12.06.2019 in connection with case No. Special (POCSO) 08 of 2018 whereby and whereunder the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Dharmanagar, North Tripura had convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under S.354 - A(1)(i) of the IPC and under S.8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act , 2012 (for short POCSO) and, sentenced him to suffer R.I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- with default stipulation for commission of offence under S.354 - A(1)(i) of the IPC and further sentenced him to suffer R.I. for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- with default stipula
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
