SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 498

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
X, J
All India Trinamool Congress and Another v. State of Tripura and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: X
For the Respondents: Y

Table of Content
1. court observed policy decisions must be respected. (Para 1 , 6)
2. prohibitory order for public safety. (Para 2 , 3)
3. legal challenge required to contest state orders. (Para 4 , 5)

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Advocate General appearing for the State on advance copy. Looking to the issues involved we have proceeded to dispose of the appeal finally with the consent of both sides.

2. The appeal is filed by the original petitioner, a political party. In the writ petition the prayer was for a direction to the state authorities to allow the petitioner to organize a protest rally on 22 September, 2021 against what the petitioner alleged were "terrible attacks and inhuman vandalism inflicted on media houses". The petitioner had first approached the SDPO, Sadar, Agartala under a letter dated 11.09.2021 seeking permission for holding the rally on 15.09.2021 which was rejected by a letter dated 13.09.2021 on the ground of law and order situation. On 13.09.2021 the petitioner wrote to SDPO and offered to reschedule the rally on 16 September, 2021. Permission for this was also refused by the SDPO on 13.09.2021. On 14.09.2021 the petitioner again wrot














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top