Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
string, string
Sujan Das v. State of Tripura and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial conviction for house trespass and outrage of modesty. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. victim’s cross-examination indicates case arose from misunderstanding. (Para 6 , 16 , 24) |
| 3. inherent powers of the court in quashing non-compoundable offences. (Para 9 , 14) |
| 4. conviction requires evidence beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 10 , 12 , 15) |
1. By means of filing a criminal revision petition on 04.06.2018 petitioner challenged the judgment and order dated 28.03.2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gomati Judicial District in Criminal Appeal No. 47(3) of 2016 affirming the judgment and order dated 12.08.2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amarpur in Case No. GR 184 of 2011 whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate convicted the petitioner for offence punishable under S.448 and S.354 IPC and sentenced him to RI for one year under S.448 and RI for 2 years under S.354 and a fine of Rs.5,000/- with default stipulation.
2. The genesis of the prosecution case is rooted in the FIR lodged by the mother of victim with the officer in charge of Birganj police station at Amarpur on 03.11.2011 wherein it was alleged that at about 10.30 pm at previous night, the petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
