SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 511

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
, J
Md. Majid Miah alias Sheikh Mujibur Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ST(T - I) 38 of 2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. P. K. Biswas, Mr. P. Majumder, Mrs. V. Poddar, Ms. S. Debbarma
For the Respondents: Mr. Sumit Debnath

The court upheld conviction for murder based on credible evidence from related and independent witnesses, emphasizing that their relationship with the victim does not inherently undermine credibility.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 302 - Conviction and sentence of life imprisonment for murder - Appellants convicted for premeditated assault resulting in death - Evidence provided by related and independent witnesses supported prosecution claims. (Paras 1-26)

(B) Delay in FIR - Court found explanation satisfactory due to victim's treatment circumstances - Delay did not compromise its integrity. (Paras 9, 13-14)

(C) Witness credibility - Related witnesses can be reliable; their relationship does not automatically suggest bias - Court emphasized the necessity for evidence corroboration from multiple sources. (Paras 18-24)

Facts of the case:
The appeal concerns the conviction and life imprisonment of four appellants for the murder of Shahjahan Miah, stemming from an assault involving multiple accused. The incident occurred on 27.09.2013, leading to the victim's death on 01.10.2013 after treatment.

Findings of Court:
The learned Addl. Sessions Judge found guilt based on consistent testimonies of related and independent witnesses, and the prosecution case was deemed credible despite some inconsistencies.

Issues: The central issues were the admissibility of related witness testimonies and the explanation for the delay in filing the FIR.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that related witnesses do not inherently lack credibility, instead affirming their testimonies when consistent; the delay in FIR was justifiable.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments from both parties regarding the credibility of witnesses. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's analysis of witness statements and credibility. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. legal principles regarding witness credibility in cases involving relatives. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
5. conclusion of the court affirming conviction. (Para 26)

1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 04.01.2021, passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in connection with ST(T - I) 38 of 2015, whereby and whereunder the appellants were convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- each with default stipulation for committing offence punishable under S.302 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. Shortly stated, the prosecution case was set on motion on the basis of the written complaint lodged by one Abdul Rahim (hereinafter referred to as 'informant') against the accused persons, namely (i) Md. Helal Miah, (ii) Md. Khurshed Miah, (iii) Md. Murshed Miah, (iv) Sheikh Mujibur Khan, (v) Md. Rashid Miah, (vi) Md. Sajal Miah, (vii) Md. Iqbal Miah, (viii) Sheikh Rabi Khan, (ix) Md. Dulal Miah, (x) Mst. Jarina Begam, (xi) Mst. Hafija Khatoon, (xii) Md. Mirjan Miah and (xiii) Md. Rafique Miah. It is stated, inter alia that on 27.09.2013 at about 7.30 pm, one Shahjahan Miah (here - in - after referred to as 'deceased'), nephew of the informant went to the shop of accused Khurshid Miah for purchasing certain articles. At that time, all the accused persons armed with lathi(stick), iron rod, etc. made a preplanned attack upon the deceased and assaulted him by making blows indiscriminately causing serious bleeding injuries on various parts of his body including head, and as a result, the deceased lost his sense at the spot. Deceased was, thereafter rescued by his brother Rabiul Alam accompanied with other local people and brought him to local hospital for treatment. Initially, the deceased was referred to ILS Hospital wherefrom he was taken to Apollo Hospital, Kolkata for better treatment. During treatment in the hospital at Kolkata the deceased succumbed to his injuries on 01.10.2013.

3. The said written complaint lodged on 27.09.2013 had led the Officer In - charge, West Agartala Police Station to register a specific case vide West Agartala PS Case No.305/2013 under S.341/325/34 of IPC. Investigation was carried on initially by SI Adhar Debbarma(here - in - after referred to as the 1st IO) and subsequently the investigation was entrusted to Inspector Milan Ch. Dutta(here - in - after referred to as the 2nd IO). On conclusion of investigation, charge sheet was submitted under S.341/302/34 of IPC against all the above named accused persons.

4. During investigation, the 1st IO had visited the place of occurrence, prepared hand - setch map of the place of occurrence with separate index. He also examined the witnesses, namely Abdul Rahim, Gobinda Das and Hasina Begam. The 1st IO also had seized the alleged broom, a piece of stone (commonly called 'Puta' in local language which is used for mixing / making paste of various spices), a piece of wooden file, a piece of firewood measuring more than one cubit in length, a lathi(stick), one handle of spade measuring one and half cubits in length, one wooden lathi(stick) measuring one and half cubits in length and one iron rod measuring one and half cubits in length by way of preparing seizure list dated 28.09.2013. The 1st IO also arrested the accused Khurshid Miah and Jarina Begam on 02.10.2013. At this stage of investigation, the 1st IO having been transferred handed over the case docket to the Officer In - charge. The 2nd IO having started the investigation on 10.10.2013 had prepared separate hand - sketch map and index. He also examined and recorded the statements of some other witnesses. H






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top