Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Arindam Lodh, J
ONGC – Appellant
Versus
Swapan Kumar Paul – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant’s appeal against a composite arbitrator’s award. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. counsel arguing for separate awards based on distinct contracts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's rationale for affirming arbitrary deductions and interest decisions. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 4. court upholding terms of contracts regarding interest calculations. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
1. By means of filing this appeal under S.37 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (''the Arbitration Act'' hereunder) the appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 28.06.2019 passed by the District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in case No. Civil. Misc. (Arbitration) 18 of 2018. The proceedings before the learned District Judge arose out of an application filed under S.34 of the Arbitration Act by the present appellant for setting aside the arbitral award dated 29.03.2010 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the arbitral proceedings arising out of 05 contracts out of which 04 contracts were executed between Sri. Swapan Kumar Pal and Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) and one contract was executed between Smt. Namita Paul, wife of Swapan Kumar Paul and ONGC. The appeal filed by Smt.Namita Paul (cas
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
