SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7420

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
, J
Adwitiya Chakrabarti v. Union of India


Table of Content
1. possession of exotic species without disclosure is questioned. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. the court affirms legislative adherence to existing wildlife and customs acts. (Para 6 , 10 , 12)
3. court dismisses petition based on insufficient grounds for intervention. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

1. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard all parties.

2. The above PIL petition is filed by a law graduate in public interest with prayers to seek issuance of show cause to the respondents as to why a writ of or in the nature of Mandamus shall not be issued declaring that possession of all exotic animals / birds by persons (other than those who have made voluntary disclosure with the time contemplated in Advisory, dated 11.06.2020(Annexure - 3), issued by Respondent No. 1, is illegal and the person in possession of such exotic animals / birds be forthwith prosecuted for violation under the Customs Act by Department of Revenue Intelligence and under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 .

3. Petitioner relies upon news articles (Annexures - 1 and 2) to demonstrate that there is proliferation of trade in exotic wildlife species in the State.

4. Petitioner submits that Birds and Animals can





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top