TRIPURA HIGH COURT
, J
Adwitiya Chakrabarti v. Union of India
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. possession of exotic species without disclosure is questioned. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. the court affirms legislative adherence to existing wildlife and customs acts. (Para 6 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. court dismisses petition based on insufficient grounds for intervention. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
1. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard all parties.
2. The above PIL petition is filed by a law graduate in public interest with prayers to seek issuance of show cause to the respondents as to why a writ of or in the nature of Mandamus shall not be issued declaring that possession of all exotic animals / birds by persons (other than those who have made voluntary disclosure with the time contemplated in Advisory, dated 11.06.2020(Annexure - 3), issued by Respondent No. 1, is illegal and the person in possession of such exotic animals / birds be forthwith prosecuted for violation under the Customs Act by Department of Revenue Intelligence and under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 .
3. Petitioner relies upon news articles (Annexures - 1 and 2) to demonstrate that there is proliferation of trade in exotic wildlife species in the State.
4. Petitioner submits that Birds and Animals can
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.