SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7425

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
, J
Sri Rupak Banik – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Suparna Paul – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. A. Bhowmik
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Datta

Table of Content
1. appeal based on validity of marriage. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. issues raised about marriage and its legality. (Para 4 , 5)
3. evidence is crucial for establishing marriage validity. (Para 6 , 11)
4. final judgment upheld, ruling marriage void. (Para 12)

1. This is an appeal filed under S.19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 assailing the judgment dated 16.03.2021 passed in T.S.(Null) 1 of 2020 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Sonamura, Sepahijala Tripura whereby the learned Court below declared the marriage between the appellant and the respondent dated 10.08.2019 as and void.

2. The fact of the case, in brief, according to the appellant - Sri Rupak Banik is that, the respondent herein, Smt. Suparna Paul is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized at the house of Nidhan Paul of village - Office tilla, under Bishalgarh P.S. on 10 August, 2019 according to Hindu religion, Vedic rites and ceremonies. The marriage declaration was done between them on 6 September, 2019 before the Notary Public at Bishalgarh. After that, a 'certificate of marriage' bearing No.148 SDM / BLG / JDL was also issued on 13.09.2019 in favour of them.
After marriag





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top