SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7433

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
B. D. Deka, Mr. M. Talukdar, JJ
Pabitra Boro v. Sabitri Nath
Art.227 of the Constitution of India | L.G. Case No.17/2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. B. D. Deka
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Talukdar

Possession without lawful entitlement constitutes land grabbing; mere long-term possession does not confer legal title under the Assam Land Grabbing Act, 2010.

Headnote:(A) Assam Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2010 - Sections 2(d), 2(e), 3, 7, 8, 10, and 11 - This application under Art. 227 challenges the decision of a Special Tribunal regarding land grabbing. The court notes a lack of lawful ownership or title by the respondents on the disputed land. The definitions in the act clarify that mere possession without lawful entitlement constitutes land grabbing - The principle of 'settled possession' was discussed, underscoring that long-term possession does not equate to lawful title. The applicant's rights were upheld, confirming that physical possession must be legally entitled. (Paras 19, 30, and 34)

Facts of the case:
The applicant alleges unlawful land occupation by the respondents after her husband’s death. The Tribunal confirmed her ownership based on sale and possession evidence, contrary to the respondents' claims of rightful possession since 1982.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that the respondents did not establish legal possession and were deemed land grabbers.

Issues: Key issues involved the definition of land grabbing, the status of settled possession, and the lack of title by the respondents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the act mandates proof of lawful entitlement alongside possession, reiterating that settled possession do not confer ownership without a legal basis.

Result: Petition dismissed.

1. Heard Mr. B. D. Deka, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. M. Talukdar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.

2. This is an application filed under Art.227 of the Constitution of India assailing the judgment dated 07.09.2021 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Special Tribunal, Kamrup (M) under Assam Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2010 (for short the "Act of 2010") in L.G. Case No.17/2015.

3. At the outset, it is relevant to take note of that against the judgment and decree passed in a proceedings under the Act of 2010, an appeal lies before a Special Court on any question of law or fact under S.13 of the Act of 2010. S.13(2) of the Act of 2010 provides, separate appeal against the respective judgment and order of the Special Tribunal passed in respect of the civil proceedings as well as in criminal proceedings respectively and the period of limitation is 60 days from the respective date of judgment and order passed in each of the said proceedings. However as on date, as admitted in bar, there is no Special Court constituted in terms with S.14 of the Act of 2010 and under such circumstances the instant application has been filed under Art.227 of the Constitution of India.

4. Taking into account that as there is no appellate forum constituted and the instant application has been filed under Art.227 of the Constitution thereby invoking the Superintending Powers of this Court, this Court vide an order dated 15.11.2021 admitted the instant application on the following question:
"Whether in the facts of the instant case, the provisions of Assam Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2010 is applicable taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners were in settled position of the land ?"

5. To appreciate the question so framed, it would be relevant to take note of the brief facts of the instant case. For the purpose of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as in the same status as they stood before the Tribunal below. The respondent herein as applicant had filed an application under S.8(2) of the Act of 2010 against four respondents out of which the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are the petitioners before this Court.

6. The case of the applicant is that the husband of the applicant purchased from one Kanailal Sikaria through registered Sale Deed No.7089 dated 06.10.1972 a plot of land measuring 33 Bighas 17 Lechas and the same was mutated in the name of her husband late Bhuban Nath. It is the further case of the applicant that after acquiring the ownership, the applicant's husband took over the possession of the land in the year 1972 itself. During the lifetime of her husband in the month of February, 2009, the respondents tried to occupy the plot of land but could not succeed to do so. Thereafter, upon the expiry of her husband on 25.06.2013, the applicant being a widow and helpless woman, the respondents encroached upon the land of the applicant and started constructing temporary houses and thereafter permanent structures etc. upon the disputed land. The applicant tried her best to persuade the respondents not to do so but the respondents refused to vacate the possession or stop construction over the disputed plots of land. Under such circumstances, the applicant filed the application under S.8(2) of the Act of 2010. The said application so filed was registered and numbered as L.G. Case No.17/2015.

7. The Court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge No.1 which have been designated as Special Tribunal, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati vide an order dated 10.09.2015 issued notice upon the Circle Officer, Dispur Revenue Circle for inspection and verification of a plot of land measuring 2 Bigha 1 Katha covered by Dag Nos. 1484, 1485, 1487 and 1486 of Patta No.712, Village No.2, Maidam under Beltola Mouza in the District of Kamrup (M), Assam and to submit a full and complete report within 3 (three) weeks from the date of the receipt of the said order on the various aspect

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top