Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
, J
Ranjit Kr. Mushahary v. Union of India
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the pil and history of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's observations on the absence of representation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioner's requests and the railway's responses. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. evaluation of grievances and court's decision. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final orders and closure of the pil. (Para 14 , 15) |
1. The petitioner is an advocate by profession. This PIL was filed by the PIL petitioner to bring to the notice of this Court, the hardships faced by general people of the State of Assam as they are unable to purchase Tatkal tickets from the Railway Authority in needs of urgency because of non - implementation by the respondent - Railway Authority of Public Accounts Committee (herein after referred to as "PAC") 80 Report 2012-2013 on the Railways as submitted by the then Chairman, PAC. It is the grievance of the PIL petitioner that in spite of 80 PAC Report of 2012-13 having been circulated widely through print media as well as through other various sources of correspondence, the same has not been implemented by the Railway Authorities. The PIL petitioner who is a resident of the District of Kokrajhar, Assam has ventilated his grievances wh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
