SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7443

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Sandeep Mehta, C. J., Suman Shyam, J.
State of Assam v. Deepar Beel Pachpara Samabai Samity Ltd.
Intra-Court Appeal | WP(C) No.4113/2009



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. D. Mazumdar
For the Respondents: Mr. U. K. Nair

The court upheld the state's authority to declare a wildlife sanctuary despite claims of traditional rights not being substantiated.

Headnote:(A) Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18, 21, 22, 19, 20 and 24 - Notification to declare area as Wildlife Sanctuary - Notification dated 21.02.2009 challenged for violation of statutory procedure - Traditional fishing rights claimed by petitioners not established - Court held absence of evidence to substantiate rights, thus affirms Government's decision. (Paras 1-19)

(B) Legal Procedure - Issuance of proclamation under S.21 - Requirement for proper publication emphasized - Any failure in due process does not affect merits where claims are unsubstantiated. (Paras 12-17)

Facts of the case:
The appeal arises from a judgment setting aside a government notification declaring Deepor Beel as a Wildlife Sanctuary due to claimed traditional fishing rights by a community, which the court found unproven.

Findings of Court:
The impugned judgment deemed unsustainable due to lack of evidence supporting traditional rights and procedural deficiencies not affecting the determined issue.

Issues: Core issue was whether the 21.02.2009 notification violated the statutory procedure for declaration under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The absence of substantiated claims of traditional rights rendered the need for statutory compliance moot. The declaration of sanctuary was legally sound under the Act.

Result: Appeal allowed.

Table of Content
1. procedural challenges to sanctuary designation leading to examination of traditional rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments for and against recognition of the rights claimed. (Para 5 , 6)
3. examination and application of statutory provisions under the act. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. final court judgment validating the legality of the government notification. (Para 19)
5. acknowledgment of rights claim possibility post-judgment. (Para 20)

1. This intra - court appeal, preferred by the State of Assam, is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.12.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.4113/2009 setting aside the notification dated 21.02.2009 issued under S.18 and S.26A(1)(b) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 declaring an area of 4.1 Sq. K.M. of the water body commonly known as the "Deepor Beel" to be a Wildlife Sanctuary within the meaning of the Act of 1972. The brief factual matrix of the case, as apparent from the materials on record, is narrated hereunder.

2. On 12.01.1989, an initial notification expressing the intent of the Government to declare the "Deepor Beel" as a Wild Life Sanctuary was issued under S.18 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (herein after referred to as "the Act of 1972") which was published in the Assam Gazette on 22.03.1989. Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) was appointed as the Collector under S.2(9) of the Act of 1972 so as to enquire into and determine the existence, nature and extent of rights, if any, in favour of any person. On 22.06.1993, notice was issued inviting claims of rights on the land over which the proposed sanctuary was to be created. In response to the notice dated 22.06.1993 some persons had submitted their objections on 13.07.1993. On 22.07.1993 the Chairperson of No.32, Dharapur Gaon Panchayat had also submitted objection to the proposal for creation of a sanctuary over the "Deepor Beel". Taking note of the objections so received, on 07.01.1994, the Collector had expressed an opinion that there should be no hurry to declare the Deepor Beel as a Bird Sanctuary without first ensuring the alternative means of livelihood for the people living in the vicinity of the Beel. It appears that the Assam Fisheries Development Corporation (AFDC) had earlier entered into a seven years lease agreement granting fishing rights over a part of the beel. As such, on 14.07.1999, the Divisional Forest Officer (DFO), Assam State Zoo Division, Guwahati had requested the Managing Director of Assam Fisheries Development Corporation to withdraw the leasing rights granted in respect of the Deepor Beel on the ground that fishing activities were prohibited in the said beel under the Act of 1972. The lease was, however, cancelled on 29.11.1999 on account of non - payment of kists (installments) for the year 1999-2000 and the possession of the fishery was taken back by the Corporation. Notwithstanding the same, the respondents / writ petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 had requested the Managing Director of AFDC to settle the Deepor Beel fishery with them. On 29.05.2002, an order was passed rescinding the draft notification dated 12.01.1989. However, by issuing a subsequent notification dated 17.08.2002, the order dated 29.05.2002 was withdrawn as a result of which, the initial notification dated 12.01.1989 was restored. It appears that on 05.01.2006, the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Rev) was appointed as the Collector to determine the existence, nature and extent of right, if any, existing in favour of any person and accordingly notice inviting claims and objections from interested parties issued by the Collector was published on 31.05.2006 in two local Dailies viz., "Amar Asom" and "The Sentinel". Since neither any objection nor any claim was received by the authorities, the impugned notification dated 21.02.2009 was issued declaring an area of 4.1 Sq.K.M. of water body as the "Deepor Beel Wild Life Sanctuary". The respon

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top