SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 8256

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
A. S. Bopanna, J
Subidita Nath v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. S.B. Laskar
For the Respondents: Mr. A.R. Bhuyan

Table of Content
1. analysis of eligibility for rgglv distributorship. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments concerning residence and delay in filing. (Para 4 , 5)
3. judicial interpretation of residency definitions and their applicability. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15)
4. final ruling dismissing the appeal. (Para 16)

1. The present intra - court appeal is filed by the appellant being aggrieved with the order dated 04.01.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 505/2021 and WP(C) No. 5277/2021, whereby the learned Single Judge has set aside the selection of the appellant as a Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitarak (RGGLV distributor) for the area of Sudarshanpur Part - II and Part - III of Kalacherra Grant under Sudarshanpur - Kalacherra Gram Panchayat in the district of Hailakandi, Assam, and has directed the IOCL authorities to make allotment of the RGGLV distributorship by making a fresh draw of lots as per the categorization provided in the advertisement as well as the guidelines.

2. The facts which are necessary for the adjudication of the present appeal are that pursuant to an advertisement issued by the IOCL authorities, the appellant as well as the respondent No. 6 / writ petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top