HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
JUMAR ALI AND 27 ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. – Respondent
WP(C) / 93 / 2026
GAHC010001682026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/93/2026 JUMAR ALI AND 27 ORS.
S/O ABDUL GONI
2: RAJBHANU BIBI
D/O AJAM ALI
W/O GIYAS UDDIN
3: ASAD ALI
S/O MUJAHAR ALI
4: KOKMAR ALI
S/O LATE MASAR ALI
5: AHAMMAD ALI
S/O ABDUL KARIM
6: ABDUL GONI MONDAL @ GONI MONDAL
S/O LATE KEFAT ALI
7: ALI HUSSAIN
S/O MAGADH ALI
8: ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE
S/O ABDUL KARIM
9: NUR ISLAM SARKAR
S/O CHEBAT SARKAR
10: NURUL ISLAM @ NUR ISLAM
S/O JANIK ULLAH
11: SAMSUL HOQUE
S/O MENAJ ALI
12: TAMSI BIBI W/O RAMJAN ALI
13: SABAR ALI S/O SONAULLAH
14: SULTAN ALI S/O SUKUR ALI
15: REJINA BEGUM W/O SONAULLAH SHEIKH
16: SEKENDAR ALI S/O ALIMUDDIN ALI
17: DELDAR ALI @ DELBAR ALI @ DELDAR ALI SARKAR S/O CHEPAT SARKAR
18: ABUL KALAM S/O JANIK ULLAH MUNSHI
19: NAIBUDDIN S/O KACHAM ALI
20: SAHIT ALI S/O ISMAIL HUSSAIN 21: AJIBAR RAHMAN S/O ANSER ALI
22: FAJAR ALI S/O TABJAL HOSEN
23: KERAMAT ALI S/O ABDUL RASHIK
24: OSMAN ALI S/O SAYED ALI
25: ABDUL BAREK S/O JANIK ULLAH MUNSHI
26: MD. ALI AKBOR MONDAL S/O AJOR ALI MONDAL
27: ABDUL OHAB S/O JANIK ULLAH
28: ABUL KASHEM S/O JANIK ULLAH MUNSHI ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILL- CHARUA BAKHRA JUNGLE BLOCK P.O. CHAPOR DIST. DHUBRI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER AND COLLECTGOR OF DHUBRI AT DHUBRI P.O. (HEAD OFFICE)
PIN-783301
3:CO-DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BILASIPARA P.O. AND P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783348.
4:CIRCLE OFFICER CHAPAR REVENUE CIRCLE P.O.AND P.S. CHAPAR DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783377 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH, MS F INTAZ Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
06.01.2026 Heard Mr. MA Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R Borpujari, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue and Disaster management Department for the respondent no.1 and Mr. D Natah, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondents no. 2, 3 & 4.
2. The petitioners 28 in numbers claim to be residents of the area, the particulars of which are specified in Schedule- A to schedule A-2, which are enclosed to the writ petition. The grievance of the petitioners are that by way of eviction notice dated 03.01.2026 issued by the respondent no.3 individually to the petitioners, the respondent authorities have sought to undertake a process for eviction of the petitioners, as this land stated to be under the occupation of the writ petitioners is said to be requisitioned land.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this notice dated 03.01.2026 was served on the petitioners giving three days time to reply and as such, in view of the short period for replying to the notice, the petitioners have expressed strong apprehension that the eviction process will be carried out today. The learned counsel for the petitioners has also referred to the order dated 17.11.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 6454 of 2025, which was filed by some of the petitioners and the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of the said writ petition directed as under:
“……
8. As the respondent no.2, who has issued the notice and orders, impugned herein, has an obligation to dispose of the representations submitted by the petitioners-noticees after due consideration, this Court taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, is of the considered view that if the representations submitted by the petitioners notices have not yet been disposed of by the respondent no.2, then the respondent no.2 shall take those representations on board, which are annexed as Annexure- A1 to Annexure-A33 of the writ petition, for consideration and after giving due consideration, shall dispose of the same by taking into account the grounds raised in the written objection, by way of separate speaking orders. The respondent no.2 shall pass the speaking order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.