HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
KIRANMOYEE CHOUDHURY @ DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
RITA BAISHYA TALUKDAR AND ANR – Respondent
CRP / 10 / 2021
##PAGE1##
Page No.# 1/11
GAHC010015922021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP/10/2021
KIRANMOYEE CHOUDHURY @ DUTTA
D/O. KARUNA NARAYAN CHOUDHURY, R/O. VILL. BIDYAPUR, NALBARI
TOWN, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN-781335.
VERSUS
RITA BAISHYA TALUKDAR AND ANR
W/O. SHRI NARASH TALUKDAR, VILL. BIDYAPUR, NALBARI TOWN, DIST.
NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN-782335.
2:MD. OII ALI @ OLIUR RAHMAN
W/O. RAUSAN ALI
VILL. ISLAM CHUPA
NALBARI TOWN
DIST. NALBARI
ASSAM
PIN-782335
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R J BORDOLOI, MR. R ALI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR S DIFUSA, MR D CHOUDHURY
Linked Case : CRP/65/2020
KIRANMOYEE CHOUDHURY @ DUTTA
W/O KARUNA NARAYAN CHOUDHURY
R/O VILL. BIDYAPUR
NALBARI TOWN
DIST. NALBARI
ASSAM
##PAGE2##Page No.# 2/11
VERSUS
RITA BAISHYA TALUKDAR AND ANR.
W/O SHRI NARASH TALUKDAR
R/O VILL. BIDYAPUR
NALBARI TOWN
DIST. NALBARI
ASSAM
2:MD. OLI ALI @ OLIUR RAHMAN
W/O RAUSAN ALI
R/O VILL. ISLAM CHUPA
NALBARI TOWN
DIST NALBARI
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. R J BORDOLOI
Advocate for : MR D CHOUDHURY appearing for RITA BAISHYA TALUKDAR
AND ANR.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
Date : 19.12.2025
1. Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.
Difusa, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.
2. None has appeared for respondent No. 2.
3. By this common order, this Court proposes to dispose of Civil Revision
Petition No. 10/2021 as well as Civil Revision Petition No. 65/2020 as both these
cases arose out of Order dated 26.06.2018 passed by the Court of learned Civil
Judge, Nalbari in Misc.(J) Case No. 4/2018 arising out of Title Suit No. 1 of
2018.
4. The Civil Revision Petition No. 65/2020 has been filed by the petitioner
##PAGE3##Page No.# 3/11
on being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 passed by the
Court of the learned District Judge, Nalbari in Misc. Appeal No. 4/2018 which
was filed by the present petitioner impugning the Order dated 26.06.2018
passed by the learned Civil Judge, Nalbari in Misc.(J) Case No. 4/2018.
Whereas, the Civil Revision Petition No. 10/2021 has been filed by the present
petitioner impugning the Order dated 07.12.2020 passed in Misc. Appeal No.
5/2018 wherein the respondent No. 2 had challenged the Order dated
26.06.2018 passed in Misc.(J) Case No. 4/2018 in connection with Title Suit No.
1/2018. Though, the aforesaid Civil revision petitions are directed against the
Orders of the First Appellate Court passed in two different Misc. Appeal cases,
namely, Misc. Appeal No. 4/2018 and Misc. Appeal No. 5/2018, however, as both
the misc. Appeals were registered and were directed against a common order
passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge, Nalbari in Misc.(J) Case No. 4/2018
arising out of Title Suit No. 1/2018 on 26.06.2018. Hence, both these civil
revision petitions are dealt with together by this common order.
5. The facts relevant for consideration of the above mentioned Civil
Revision Petitions, in brief, are that the present respondent No. 1, as plaintiff,
has instituted a Title Suit No. 1/2018 before the Court of learned Civil Judge,
Nalbari seeking declaration of her right, title and interest and recovery of khas
possession as well as for permanent injunction over Schedule A Land measuring
1 Katha 10 Lechas covered by Dag No. 175 of NK Patta No. 18 in Ward No. 7 of
Nalbari town. It has been pleaded in the plaint of the plaintiff (respondent No.1)
herein that the aforesaid plot of land was purchased by her from the present
petitioner by executing a registered sale deed No. 2482/2010 and thereafter the
delivery of possession of the said land was also made in favour of the
respondent No. 1. The present petitioner does not have any dispute regarding
##PAGE4##Page No.# 4/11
the sale of the land in favour of respondent No. 1. The title suit was filed by the
respondent No. 1 mainly against the present respondent No. 2 alleging trespass
into the Schedule-A land on 28.01.2013 by the said respondent No.2 claiming
that the said land falls within the Dag No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.