SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 9013

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA, MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
MAYA RANI SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. – Respondent
WP(C) / 1140 / 2019



GAHC010032682019

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/1140/2019

MAYA RANI SARKAR

D/O. DHIRENDRA MANDAL @ DHIREN CHANDRA MANDAL, W/O.

HARIHAR SARKAR @ HARIHARI SARKAR @ HARICHARAN SARKAR, R/O.

VILLAGE BARIPUKHURI PART-I, P.S. ABHAYAPURI, DIST. BONGAIGAON,

ASSAM. VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.

THROUGH- THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GRIHA MANTRALAYA,

NEW DELHI.

2:THE STATE OF ASSAM

THROUGH- THE SECRETARY

TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

HOME DEPTT.

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6.

3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

NIRVACHAN SADAN ASOKA ROAD

NEW DELHI- 110001.

4:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR

NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF CITIZEN

ASSAM

BHANGAGARH

GUWAHATI.

5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

BONGAIGAON

P.O. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM.

6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER)

BONGAIGAON P.O. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MR. F A HASSAN,MS J BORAH,SUSHMITA SENGUPTA Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., SC, F.T,MR J PAYENG,SC, NRC,MS. A VERMA,SC, ECI,MR. D BARUAH BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER Date : 16-12-2025 JUDGMENT AND ORDER (C.A.V.)

(K.R. Surana, J)

Heard Mr. F.A. Hassan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. A.

Verma, learned standing counsel for the Foreigners Tribunal, Mr. A.I. Ali, learned standing counsel for the Election Commission of India, Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned CGC and Mr. P. Sarma, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate.

2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the opinion dated 13.12.2018, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal, Bongaigaon No.2, Abayapuri, in BNGN/FT-2/APR/Case No.257/2016, corresponding to BNGN IMDT Case no. 506/2003, by which the petitioner was declared to be a foreigner of post

25.03.1971 stream.

3. Upon receipt of notice of the proceedings, the petitioner had appeared before the learned Foreigners Tribunal and filed her written statement in defence and took a plea that she is a citizen of India. It was stated that the father of the petitioner, namely, Dhirendra Mondal, along with his father, late Budheswar Mondal, had migrated from the then Maimansingha district of East Pakistan to India and their names were entered in the Refugee and Rehabilitation Department and they were issued a “Token for Migrants” by the Govt. of West Bengal and they settled at village Mohanpur under North Salmara Police Station in the district of Goalpara. The father of the petitioner, along with his brother, Fotik Chandra Mondal, shifted their residence to village Nayapara (Nowapara) Part-I under Bijni Police Station, as it was then, now Manikpur Police Station, in the Goalpara district. The name of the petitioner’s father was enrolled in the voter’s list of 1970 as Dhiren Mondal instead of his correct name of Dhirendra Mondal and his name along with his father’s name also appeared in the voter list of 1971 under 34 No. Abhayapuri North LAC. The names of the father and mother of the petitioner appeared in the voter list of 1985 of village Nowapara Part-1 under 34 Abayapuri North LAC and in this voter list the name of the father of the petitioner appeared as Dhiren Chandra Mondal instead of Dhirendra Mondal. The petitioner studied upto Class-X. She was born in the year 1979 and she had married to Sri Harihar Sarkar of village Baripukhri Part-I under Abhayapuri Police Station in the district of Bongaigaon. The name of the petitioner was enrolled in the voter list in the year 2005.

4. The petitioner had explained that she was married on attaining the age of 18 years and her name was not enrolled in the voter list along with her parents because immediately after her marriage she started to live with her husband. The name of the petitioner also appeared in the voters list of 2008, 2011, 2016. The petitioner has also a PAN card issued by the Income Tax Department. Accordingly, the petitioner claims that she is a citize

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top