GAHC010157782025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/4061/2025

SANJAY KUMAR JALAN

SON OF LATE LAXMI NARAYAN JALAN, RESIDENT OF HIJUGURI, PO AND

PS TINSUKIA, DISTRICT- TINSUKIA, ASSAM

VERSUS

M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND 8 ORS

(ASSAM OIL DIVISION) HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AND OFFICE AT DIGBOI TOWN, P.O. DIGBOI, DISTRICT- TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-

786125, ASSAM REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR/CHAIRMAN.

2:THE GENERAL MANAGER (RETAIL SALES)

INDIAN OIL -AOD

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.

INDIAN OIL BHAWAN

SECTOR- III NOONMATI

GUWAHATI-20

KAMRUP METRO

ASSAM

3:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (RETAIL SALES)

INDIAN OIL -AOD

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.

TINSUKIA DIVISIONAL OFFICE

SRIPURIA ROAD

P.O. AND DISTRICT- TINSUKIA

ASSAM

PIN- 786125.

4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (MARKETING DIVISION)

SECTOR- III NOONMATI GUWAHATI-20 KAMRUP METRO ASSAM

5:RAJESH KR. JALAN SON OF LATE LAXMI NARAYAN JALAN RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO 17 GAYATRI KUNJ CHITRALEKHA PATH NEAR GNRC HOSPITAL SUPERMARKET PO AND PS DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM

6:SMT SHANTI DEVI JALAN WIFE OF LATE LAXMI NARAYAN JALAN RESIDENT OF DR PANKAJ GOEL PARBOTI FEEDER ROAD OPPOSITE A R WINE PO AND DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM

7:SRI SURESH KUMAR JALAN SON OF LATE LAXMI NARAYAN JALAN RESIDENT OF GAYATRI NIWAS AT ROAD HIJUGURI PO AND PS AND DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM

8:SRI RAMESH KUMAR JALAN SON OF LATE LAXMI NARAYAN JALAN RESIDENT OF HIJUGURI PO AND PS TINSUKIA DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM

9:SMT AMITA GOEL WIFE OF DR PANKAJ GOEL PARBOTIA FEEDER ROAD OPPOSITE AR WINE PO AND DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAZUMDAR, MR B KAUSHIK,MR. P BORAH,MR. S HAZARIKA,K BHARALI,P LHAMU Advocate for the Respondent : SC, I O C, MR. D M NATH (R-5),MR G RAHUL(R-5)

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

ORDER

15.12.2025 Heard Shri B. Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri MK Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri M. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent – IOCL and Shri G. Rahul, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5.

It appears that while notice in this case was issued on 25.07.2025, the same was only confined to the respondent nos. 1 to 5. It appears that the notice is also required to be issued to the remaining respondents, who are legal heirs of the original proprietor of the petrol pump in question.

Let formal notice be issued to the respondent nos. 6 to 9.

Petitioner to take steps for service of notice upon the respondent nos. 6 to 9 by speed post with A/D. Steps within two days.

List this case on 21.01.2026 along with service report. By the said time, the respondents, who have appeared, are required to file affidavit.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant