SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 10031

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
MIZANUR RAHMAN MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 3213 / 2025



GAHC010122812025 2025:GAU-AS:16815

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/3213/2025

MIZANUR RAHMAN MONDAL

S/O LATE MOKBUL HUSSAIN, VILL- KHARUABANDHA, P.O.- FEKAMARI, P.S.- SOUTH SALMARA, DIST- SOUTH SALMARA, MANKACHAR, ASSAM,

PIN-783135

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF

ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006

2:THE CHAIRMAN OF STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE (SLC) FOR

APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006

3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF

ASSAM

PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006

4:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

5:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

SDC

SOUTH SALMARA

P.O. AND DIST- SOUTH SALMARA

ASSAM

PIN-783131

6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC) SOUTH SALMARA FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND P.O. AND DIST- SOUTH SALMARA ASSAM PIN-78313 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HOSSAIN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, SEC. EDU.

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

ORDER

Date : 05-12-2025 Heard Mr. N. Hossain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Konwar, learned Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 6 and Ms. D. Musahary, learned Standing Counsel for the Secondary Education.

2. The petitioner, by filing this writ petition, has challenged the Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024, passed by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam, Personnel (B) Department, whereby, the Government’s policy/scheme of providing appointment to a family member of a Government servant on compassionate grounds has been done away with, in complete suppression of the earlier OMs, notifications and policy/scheme relating to compassionate appointments.

3. The father of the petitioner had died in harness on 13.11.2006, while he was serving as a Grade-IV employee of Janata Higher Secondary School, Kharuabandha, under the then Inspector of Schools, DDC, Dhubri (now SDC, South Salmara in the District of South Salmara), Assam.

4. It is the case of the petitioner that, having faced extreme financial hardship following the death of his father, he submitted an application under the Government’s policy/scheme for appointment on compassionate grounds. After long lapse of time, the District Level Committee (DLC), vide its Minutes of Meeting dated 03.09.2024, recommended the petitioner, along with three others, for appointment as Assistant Teacher in a Lower Primary School. However, in the meantime, the impugned Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024 was issued, curtailing the right of the petitioner to be considered by the State Level Committee (SLC). Therefore, the petitioner seeks interference of the Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024 and to direct the SLC to consider the case of the petitioner, in accordance with the recommendation of the DLC.

5. It is stated at the Bar that, in a similarly situated matter, this Court had directed that the cases of petitioners whose applications for appointment on compassionate grounds were pending should be considered. Pursuant to such direction, the Department has issued a notice seeking applications and relevant documents from the persons whose cases are still pending.

6. Mr. Hossain, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in terms of the notice seeking applications and documents, the petitioner has already submitted his application for appointment on compassionate ground on 10.09.2025, during the pendency of this writ petition.

7. Having considered that the State respondents have issued a notice to submit the requisite applications/documents to persons seeking compassionate appointment prior to the issuance of the Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024 and that the petitioner has already submitted the application and required documents to the concerned authorities, I am of the view that no further adjudication is necessary in this proceedings. Accordingly, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top