HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
MIZANUR RAHMAN MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 3213 / 2025
GAHC010122812025 2025:GAU-AS:16815
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3213/2025
MIZANUR RAHMAN MONDAL
S/O LATE MOKBUL HUSSAIN, VILL- KHARUABANDHA, P.O.- FEKAMARI, P.S.- SOUTH SALMARA, DIST- SOUTH SALMARA, MANKACHAR, ASSAM,
PIN-783135
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:THE CHAIRMAN OF STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE (SLC) FOR
APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM
PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006
4:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
5:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
SDC
SOUTH SALMARA
P.O. AND DIST- SOUTH SALMARA
ASSAM
PIN-783131
6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC) SOUTH SALMARA FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND P.O. AND DIST- SOUTH SALMARA ASSAM PIN-78313 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HOSSAIN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, SEC. EDU.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 05-12-2025 Heard Mr. N. Hossain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Konwar, learned Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 6 and Ms. D. Musahary, learned Standing Counsel for the Secondary Education.
2. The petitioner, by filing this writ petition, has challenged the Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024, passed by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam, Personnel (B) Department, whereby, the Government’s policy/scheme of providing appointment to a family member of a Government servant on compassionate grounds has been done away with, in complete suppression of the earlier OMs, notifications and policy/scheme relating to compassionate appointments.
3. The father of the petitioner had died in harness on 13.11.2006, while he was serving as a Grade-IV employee of Janata Higher Secondary School, Kharuabandha, under the then Inspector of Schools, DDC, Dhubri (now SDC, South Salmara in the District of South Salmara), Assam.
4. It is the case of the petitioner that, having faced extreme financial hardship following the death of his father, he submitted an application under the Government’s policy/scheme for appointment on compassionate grounds. After long lapse of time, the District Level Committee (DLC), vide its Minutes of Meeting dated 03.09.2024, recommended the petitioner, along with three others, for appointment as Assistant Teacher in a Lower Primary School. However, in the meantime, the impugned Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024 was issued, curtailing the right of the petitioner to be considered by the State Level Committee (SLC). Therefore, the petitioner seeks interference of the Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024 and to direct the SLC to consider the case of the petitioner, in accordance with the recommendation of the DLC.
5. It is stated at the Bar that, in a similarly situated matter, this Court had directed that the cases of petitioners whose applications for appointment on compassionate grounds were pending should be considered. Pursuant to such direction, the Department has issued a notice seeking applications and relevant documents from the persons whose cases are still pending.
6. Mr. Hossain, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in terms of the notice seeking applications and documents, the petitioner has already submitted his application for appointment on compassionate ground on 10.09.2025, during the pendency of this writ petition.
7. Having considered that the State respondents have issued a notice to submit the requisite applications/documents to persons seeking compassionate appointment prior to the issuance of the Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024 and that the petitioner has already submitted the application and required documents to the concerned authorities, I am of the view that no further adjudication is necessary in this proceedings. Accordingly, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.