HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
PALTU CHOUHAN AND 2 ORS. – Appellant
Versus
ON THE DEATH OF GOKUL CHOUHAN HIS LEAGAL HEIRS NARESH CHOUHAN AND 5 ORS. – Respondent
CRP(IO) / 152 / 2024
GAHC010078712024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP(IO)/152/2024
PALTU CHOUHAN AND 2 ORS.
S/O- LATE RAM PRASAD CHOUHAN, R/O- TENGAPARA, WARD NO. 5,
HABRUBARI, KOKRAJHAR TOWN, P.O., P.S. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR, BTC,
ASSAM, PIN- 783370. 2: AMAN CHOUHAN
S/O- PALTU CHOUHAN
R/O- TENGAPARA
WARD NO. 5 HABRUBARI
KOKRAJHAR TOWN
P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR
BTC
ASSAM
PIN- 783370.
3: KARAN CHOUHAN
S/O- PALTU CHOUHAN
R/O- TENGAPARA
WARD NO. 5 HABRUBARI
KOKRAJHAR TOWN
P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR
BTC
ASSAM
PIN- 783370
VERSUS
ON THE DEATH OF GOKUL CHOUHAN, HIS LEAGAL HEIRS NARESH
CHOUHAN AND 5 ORS.
S/O- LATE GOKUL CHOUHAN, R/O- TENGAPARA, WARD NO. 5,
HABRUBARI, KOKRAJHAR TOWN, P.O., P.S. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR, BTC,
2:RAJU CHOUHAN WARD NO. 5 HABRUBARI KOKRAJHAR TOWN P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783370.
3:MUNIYA CHOUHAN W/O- LATE GOKUL CHOUHAN R/O- TENGAPARA WARD NO. 5 HABRUBARI KOKRAJHAR TOWN P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783370.
4:MAMONI CHOUDHURY D/O- LATE GOKUL CHOUHAN PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILL.- BARTOLOWA W/O- DIPAK CHOUDHURY R/O- WARD NO. 10 NUNIA PATTY DHUBRI TOWN P.O. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783301.
5:ON THE DEATH OF DAYAL CHOUHAN HIS LEGAL HEIRS MAMUNI CHOUHAN W/O- LATE DIN DAYAL CHOUHAN R/O- TENGAPARA WARD NO. 5 HABRUBARI KOKRAJHAR TOWN P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM
6:DINALAL CHOUHAN WARD NO. 5 HABRUBARI KOKRAJHAR TOWN P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783370 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B C DAS, N CHAUDHURY,MR. B J MUKHERJEE,MS R SAHA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M S ALAM, MD. S ALOM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
01.12.2025 Date :
Heard Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.
Alom, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 5.
Mr. Also has prayed for an adjournment.
Here in this case, the respondent No.6 is minor and the respondent No.5 is his mother, she will be representing respondent No.6.
After hearing the learned counsel for both sides, the prayer for adjournment is allowed.
List this matter after the winter vacation.
Interim order, passed earlier, shall continue till the next date of listing.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.