SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 10631

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
AMIT JAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent
AB / 2766 / 2025



GAHC010258552025 2025:GAU-AS:16322

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/2766/2025

AMIT JAIN

SON OF SHRI ASOK KUMAR JAIN, RESIDENT OF 23, SAHID SURYA SEN

ROAD, BERHAMPORE, POST OFFICE- BERHAMPORE, SUB-DISTRICT

BERHAMPORE, DISTRICT-MURSHIDABAD, WEST BENGAL PIN-742101

VERSUS

THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

THROUGH THE STANDING COUNSEL, CENTRAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY, U BHARADWAJ,MS A DAS,MR A

ATREYA,MR. T DEURI

Advocate for the Respondent : MS. M KUMARI, RC, CBI

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

ORDER

Date : 28.11.2025

Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. T.

Deuri, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. Kumari, learned

Retainer counsel, CBI, assisted by learned counsel Ms. N. Choudhury.

2. By this petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Amit Jain, has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with RC- 12(A)/2025- GWH arising out of FIR No.RC0172025A0012 registered in CBI, ACB P.S., Guwahati under Section 61 (2) of the BNSS, 2023 read with Section 7, 7A, 8, 9, 10 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

3. The facts as alleged in the FIR dated 14.10.2025 are, inter alia, that the informant who was identified as a source had lodged the FIR alleging that M/s. Mohan Lal Jain, a partnership firm having it’s office in Kolkata, West Bengal was awarded with the contract of 4-laning of National Highway-37, between Demow to End of Moran Bypass, in Dibrugarh District in the State of Assam on EPC mode, besides other contracts under PMU, Dibrugarh scheduled to be completed in July, 2024; that the firm could not complete the construction in timely manner and therefore, applied for grant of Extension of Time (for short, ‘EoT’) and issuance of Completion Certification for the said project; that, Shri Binod Kumar Jain, a representative of the aforesaid firm, informed the co-accused Shri Maisnam Riten Kumar Singh, ED & RO, NHIDCL, Guwahati on 17.09.2025 that since his firm has already completed the Emergency Landing Facility (for short, ‘ELF’) in Dibrugarh and also submitted their request for grant of EOT as well as for issuance of the Completion Certificate, and in this context, he wanted to meet the aforesaid official that on 10.10.2025, the said Binod Jain conveyed to one Amit Jain (petitioner herein), a partner of M/s Mohan Lal Jain that they were required to visit the aforesaid official at Guwahati either on 13.10.2025 or 14.10.2025; that the aforesaid Amit Jain conveyed to Binod Jain that they would have to deliver a total amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs only) as demanded by the aforesaid official; that Binod Jain conveyed to Amit Jain that he would be reaching Guwahati on 14.10.2025 to meet the official at his office; that there was every likelihood that the demanded bribe of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs) would be delivered by the Binod Jain to the official on 14.10.2025 at NHIDCL, Regional Office, Guwahati for favourable issuance of EOT and the Completion Certificate.

4. On receipt of the FIR, the Officer-in-Charge, CBI, ACB, Guwahati registered the FIR on the same date as RC0172025A0012 under Section 61 (2) of BNS, 2023 read with Section 7/8/9/10/12 of the PC Act, 1988. The case No. RC0172025A0012 was renumbered as Case No. R12(A)/2025-

GWH in the Court of learned Special Judge, CBI, Assam, Guwahati.

5. After receipt of the FIR, CBI prepared the Pre-Trap Memorandum (for short, ‘PTM’) on the same day i.e. 14.10.2025, wherein, name of particulars of 2 (two) independent witnesses as well as name of particulars of CBI officials were provided. The PTM reveals that one Shri Abhimanyu Kumar, PI and Trap Laying Officer (for short, ‘TLO’) led the CBI team for the trap. The PTM while detailing the factual background behind the trap, mentioned that there was every likelihood of a bribe of Rs.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top