HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
SMTI. ARATI BHAR AND 5 ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 1055 / 2022
GAHC010023322022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1055/2022
SMTI. ARATI BHAR AND 5 ORS
D/O LATE MATILAL BHAR
2: NARESH LAL BHAR
S/O LATE MATILAL BHAR
3: GANESH LAL BHAR
S/O LATE MATILAL BHAR
4: TILAK LAL BHAR
S/O LATE MATILAL BHAR
ALL ARE R/O VILL-KATIRAIL
P.O.-KATIRAIL
P.S.-KATIGORAH
DIST-CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-788804
5: MALATI RANI BHAR
D/O LATE MATILAL BHAR
W/O MURALI BHAR
R/O VILL-ROOPACHERRA BASTI
P.S.-KATICHERRA
DIST-HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788161
6: SANDHYA RANI BHAR
D/O LATE MATILAL BHAR
W/O MAHENDRA BHAR
R/O VILL- RATAKANDI T.E.
P.O.-RATAKANDI BASTI
ASSAM PIN-78815 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-COLLECTOR CACHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM
4:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CACHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM
5:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PUBLIC WORKS (NH) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06
6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD NH DIVISION SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788001 C/O 99 APO PIN-930112 C/O 99 APO PIN-93011 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H LASKAR, MD. S ALOM,MR. P K DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., MRS. A GAYAN,SC, PWD (NH),SC, REVENUE,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 13.11.2025 Heard Mr. P. K. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Although this writ petition is a part-heard matter, Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel, submits that Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, PWD, who is appearing in this matter, is indisposed, and therefore prays for adjournment of the matter.
This Court is not inclined to adjourn the matter; however, considering that Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, PWD, who was directed to produce the relevant records, is indisposed, this Court has no option but to adjourn the hearing.
Accordingly, list this matter after 2 (two) weeks as part- heard.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.