SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 11464

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
SMTI. ARATI BHAR AND 5 ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 1055 / 2022



GAHC010023322022

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/1055/2022

SMTI. ARATI BHAR AND 5 ORS

D/O LATE MATILAL BHAR

2: NARESH LAL BHAR

S/O LATE MATILAL BHAR

3: GANESH LAL BHAR

S/O LATE MATILAL BHAR

4: TILAK LAL BHAR

S/O LATE MATILAL BHAR

ALL ARE R/O VILL-KATIRAIL

P.O.-KATIRAIL

P.S.-KATIGORAH

DIST-CACHAR

ASSAM

PIN-788804

5: MALATI RANI BHAR

D/O LATE MATILAL BHAR

W/O MURALI BHAR

R/O VILL-ROOPACHERRA BASTI

P.S.-KATICHERRA

DIST-HAILAKANDI

ASSAM

PIN-788161

6: SANDHYA RANI BHAR

D/O LATE MATILAL BHAR

W/O MAHENDRA BHAR

R/O VILL- RATAKANDI T.E.

P.O.-RATAKANDI BASTI

ASSAM PIN-78815 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI

2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06

3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-COLLECTOR CACHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM

4:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CACHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM

5:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PUBLIC WORKS (NH) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06

6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD NH DIVISION SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788001 C/O 99 APO PIN-930112 C/O 99 APO PIN-93011 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H LASKAR, MD. S ALOM,MR. P K DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., MRS. A GAYAN,SC, PWD (NH),SC, REVENUE,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

ORDER

Date : 13.11.2025 Heard Mr. P. K. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Although this writ petition is a part-heard matter, Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel, submits that Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, PWD, who is appearing in this matter, is indisposed, and therefore prays for adjournment of the matter.

This Court is not inclined to adjourn the matter; however, considering that Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, PWD, who was directed to produce the relevant records, is indisposed, this Court has no option but to adjourn the hearing.

Accordingly, list this matter after 2 (two) weeks as part- heard.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top