HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
TAPANJIT KONWAR AND 2 ORS. – Appellant
Versus
JADAV SAIKIA IAS AND 6 ORS. – Respondent
Cont.Cas(C) / 281 / 2025
GAHC010108092025 2025:GAU-AS:14732
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/281/2025
TAPANJIT KONWAR AND 2 ORS.
SON OF LATE PUNYA KONWAR, RESIDENT OF VILL.- BORACHIRA, P.O.-
BORACHIRA, P.S.- DHEMAJI, DIST- DHEMAJI, ASSAM. PIN - 787057
2: BIDYUT GOGOI
SON OF DIMBESWAR GOGOI
RESIDENT OF VILL.- CHOWKHAM GAON
P.O.- GOWAL CHAPARI
P.S.- DHEMAJI
DIST.- DHEMAJI
ASSAM
PIN- 787057.
3: PANKAJ BURAGOHAIN
SON OF PUSPA BURAGOHAIN
RESIDENT OF VILL.- NO. 2 BORACHIRA
P.O.- BORACHIRA
P.S.- DHEMAJI
DIST.- DHEMAJI
ASSAM
PIN - 787057
VERSUS
JADAV SAIKIA, IAS AND 6 ORS.
THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, ASSAM POWER
(ELECTRICITY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, SECRETARIAT, GUWAHATI-781006,
ASSAM.
2:RAKESH KUMAR
IAS
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
BIJULEE BHAWAN
PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 ASSAM.
3:CHIRANJIB ADHIKARY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HRA)
ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 ASSAM.
4:AMRIT DAS THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NORTH LAKHIMPUR ELECTRICAL CIRCLE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
NORTH LAKHIMPUR -787001 DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM
5:SUNIL PEGU THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DHEMAJI ELECTRICAL DIVISION ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
DHEMAJI PIN- 787057 ASSAM.
6:ANKUR SAIKIA THE SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER DHEMAJI ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
DIST.- DHEMAJI PIN-787057 ASSAM.
7:JUGANANDA DUTTA THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER DHEMAJI ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
DIST.- DHEMAJI PIN- 787057 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A GOHAIN, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P N GOSWAMI (R-1 TO 7)), MR BHARGAV DAS(R-1 TO
7),MR. K P PATHAK(R-1 TO 7))
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
ORDER
Date : 31.10.2025 Heard Mr. A. Gohain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/contemnor Nos. 2 to 6.
2. By way of this contempt petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and the relevant rules, the petitioner is drawing the attention of this court to the alleged willful and deliberate disobedience and non-compliance of this court’s judgment and order dated 15.09.2023, whereby the respondent APDCL was directed to consider the cases of the individual petitioners and if they are found to have been working for more than 10 years up to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Umadevi & Others, reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1, i.e., 10.04.2006 and were working against the sanctioned posts and as an one time measure their services may be regularized, and in the event they are found not to have worked for more than 10 years up to 10.04.2006, but have worked for more than 10 years, in the meantime to consider benefit of providing them the salary at least at a minimum pay scale that are otherwise payable to an equivalent regularly appointed employee. Paragraph 9, 10 and 11 are extracted hereunder for ready reference: -
“9. In the instant case also as it is the claim of the petitioners that they have been working as contractual employees for more than 10 years and therefore would be entitled to the benefits as indicated in the above extracted portion of the judgment dated 17.01.2017.
10. Accordingly, the respondent APDCL is directed to consider the cases of the individual petitioners and if they are found to have been working for more than 10 years up to the judgment of Umadevi (supra) i.e. 10.04.2006 and were working against the sanctioned vacant post, an onetime measure may be made for their regularization. If any of the petitioners are found not to have worked for more than 10 years upto 10.04.2006, but have worked for more than 10 years in the meantime, the respondents may consider them for a benefit of providing them the salary atleast in the minimum pay scale that are otherwise payable to an equivalent regularly appointed employee, which again would be consistent with the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.