SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 12567

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
FAIJUL HAQUE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 6149 / 2025



GAHC010227882025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/6149/2025

FAIJUL HAQUE

SON OF AFTER ALI, VILL- BADANI AKHIYA, P.O.- LAWTOLA, P.S.-

MUKALMUA, MOUZA- PUB BARKHETRI, DIST.- NALBARI, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT (L.R)

DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06

2:THE DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEY

ASSAM

RUPNAGAR GHY-781032

3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

NALBARI P.O AND DIST.-NALBARI ASSAM

4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER

BARKHETRI REVENUE CIRCLE. DIST.-NALBARI ASSAM.

5:MONOWAR HUSSAIN

S/O- MOTIUR ALI VILL. - BADANI AKHIYA P.O.- LAWTOLA P.S.-

MUKALMUA DIST.- NALBARI

(ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MR. H ALI,MS A DAS,B BARMAN

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

ORDER

31.10.2025 Heard Mr. H. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner.

The present writ petitioner was a candidate who had offered his candidature for selection and appointment to the post of Gaon Pradhan of Badani Akhiya under the Pub-Barkhetri Mouza in the District of Nalbari. However, in the select list published, the petitioner was not selected and the private respondent No.5 was appointed as a Gaon Pradhan. Being aggrieved the petitioner preferred an appeal before the authority and which came to be dismissed by the authority concerned. Being aggrieved the present writ petition has been filed.

Issue notice returnable within four weeks.

Ms. M. Kalita, learned Government Advocate appears for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and Ms. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel appears for the respondent No.1 and 2.

Since the respondents are duly represented, notices are waived. However, extra copies be furnished within a period of one week from today.

Steps on the respondent No. 5 shall be taken by Speed Post within a period of one week from today.

The appointment of the private respondent shall be subject to the outcome of the writ petition.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant Order downloaded on 15-01-2026 06:05:56 AM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top